Responsive leadership - Manager Third Bridge Employee Review

5.0
Aug 7, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Third Bridge has a responsive leadership team that takes to heart their employees voices. While leadership does an excellent job in setting long term strategies to be ambitious and goal-oriented in traditional business metrics, they also take reflections from each employee into consideration for other initiatives. Examples include ESG objectives, work-life balance capabilities, and career development opportunities. Leadership is very clear in what the company achieved and didn't achieve in these initiatives, and what changes we're introducing to address the plan going forward.

Cons

As the company has grown and added divisions, roles, and programs, it's become difficult to know who oversees each. This has somewhat added a level of bureaucracy that slows progress/communication.

avatar
Third Bridge Response
5y
Thank you for taking the team to leave a review, and for your dedication and commitment over the last 5 years! I'm pleased to read you have had a positive experience, please continue to share your feedback with management and in our global employee surveys.

Explore other reviews about Third Bridge

5.0
Jun 17, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Engaging, becoming your own industry expert, self paced.

Cons

Strict numbers and repetitive work.

2.0
Apr 14, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good entry-level opportunity with exposure to fast-paced, client-facing work. The company hires driven, sociable individuals and can be a strong starting point for building communication, prioritization, and execution skills in a high-performance environment.

Cons

High turnover and inconsistent management quality significantly impact the employee experience. Success is heavily dependent on your team lead and manager, with limited recourse if you’re placed under ineffective leadership. In my experience, poor communication, lack of emotional intelligence, and unclear expectations from management made it difficult to succeed and negatively affected day-to-day productivity. Internal processes around performance management and PTO lacked transparency. I was placed on a PIP and terminated shortly after (within a week) in a way that felt abrupt and not aligned with prior communication, which was initially framed as a discussion around pending PTO. There were also delays in PTO approvals, and I experienced issues with compensation adjustments following a promotion that required follow-up to resolve.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All