Great place to grow ，but ready for fast changes. - IT TOGL Technology Employee Review

-Scientific Innovation: An exciting environment that took bold risks with cutting-edge technology, encouraging the exploration of future-forward methodologies. ​-Technical Freedom: Strong encouragement to pilot new tech, which allowed for meaningful scientific engagement and development. -​Transparent Communication: A lateral management style that promoted open, honest, and frequent dialogue. ​-Casual Environment: A distinctively un-corporate, low-bureaucracy atmosphere that made the day-to-day experience genuinely enjoyable despite the high intensity.

​-Resource Alignment: While the company had high ambitions, there was often a disconnect between the technical goals and the funding necessary to sustain them, leading to an inherently unstable operating model. -​Role Sustainability: The combination of excessive intensity and limited runway resulted in a short tenure, highlighting the challenges of the current business structure. ​-Centralized Decision-Making: While communication was open, final strategic decisions remained top-down, limiting individual influence over project sustainability. ​-Compensation: Remuneration was not fully competitive with the broader Cambridge market, particularly when factoring in the significant overtime required.

Encourages independence and self-reliance, as employees are often required to manage tasks on their own.

In my experience, the work environment lacked psychological safety. I experienced exclusion and isolation, and there were limited opportunities to be involved in meaningful or impactful roles. Decision-making was highly centralized, with an autocratic management style that did not encourage open communication or feedback. Overtime was frequent and often uncompensated. Tasks outside of my original job scope were regularly assigned without proper discussion or alignment. There was limited teamwork, and many tasks were repetitive without clear objectives or measurable outcomes, which felt demotivating over time. Job responsibilities were unclear, with frequent changes in expectations. Support and recognition were minimal, and mistakes were often highlighted without constructive guidance, which affected morale and motivation.