Frequent and erratic changes create relentless uncertainty, with leadership often shifting directions. Your role may frequently change, adding responsibilities without any corresponding increase in pay or promotion.
Employees often feel undervalued. Respectful treatment should be a given, but many feel like just another number on a spreadsheet. The level of micromanagement is excessive, with constant check-ins on your tasks.
Management can sometimes seem unapproachable. Changes to your work without notice and delays due to introduced bugs can be frustrating. Instances of inappropriate comments and a lack of adequate HR response contribute to a negative culture.
There is a noticeable blame culture from upper management. Tight deadlines are often set without sufficient notice, and when tasks aren’t finished on time, the team is blamed for having a "poor work ethic." This reflects poorly on leadership.
Inconsistent office attendance policies add to the frustration. London-based employees who miss a day are required to work in an empty office the following week, while others enjoy full remote work without oversight. This level of control and micromanagement creates a demoralising work environment.
The company’s claim of being "agile" does not match reality. Delivering large, unwieldy projects is the norm, and management’s understanding of agile principles seems flawed.
If you prefer feeling valued and appreciated at work, this may not be the ideal place. The company’s approach often leaves employees feeling overworked and insignificant, with little regard for employee satisfaction.
Recent staffing changes have created a cautious atmosphere where voicing any opinion contrary to higher-ups feels risky. High turnover, with many resignations in a short period, indicates underlying issues. Management tends to label departing staff negatively instead of self-reflecting.
These issues are just the beginning. Considering joining? Scrutinise the negative reviews carefully. The positive reviews may not reflect the reality and could be attempts to mask the company’s deeper problems. Approach with caution.
