Warning: Toxic Work Environment and Poor Leadership - Anonymous employee Supio Employee Review

1.0
Dec 10, 2024
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Food and energy drinks in kitchen

Cons

1) ) CEO's leadership style perpetrates toxic culture. Behaves rudely towards employees and is demeaning, constantly putting employees down despite their hard work. He constantly jokes about how the company is lying to their investors. 2) Some individuals within the organization have displayed unprofessional behavior, including contacting colleagues at inappropriate hours despite requests to respect boundaries. There have also been reports of microaggressions and discriminatory comments or jokes. These behaviors are covered up and allowed to continue, while employees who report this are considered overly sensitive. 3) International students, run!! They lie about job duties and essentially threaten to fire you constantly which could lead to deportation if you don't do what they ask. They actively seek out people who aren't US citizens for Operations roles and treat them poorly. 4) The company jokes regularly about lying to investors.

Explore other reviews about Supio

5.0
Feb 7, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Incredible pace, product, talent, and market opportunity. Amazing amount of career growth & opportunity.

Cons

Rapid growth startup pains. Need to accelerate hiring in key areas, that pain is felt!

1.0
Jun 13, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Talented employees who genuinely care about customers and the mission. Innovative product with strong market potential. Fast-paced environment where employees are exposed to a wide range of challenges.

Cons

Leadership culture became increasingly concerning over time. Company-wide communications often felt demoralizing rather than motivating, including messages that emphasized employee replaceability and job insecurity during periods of organizational stress. The organization felt significantly top-heavy, with layers of leadership and management while execution teams remained lean and frequently overstretched. Performance review cycles lacked consistency, transparency, and clear criteria. Many employees struggled to understand how ratings, promotions, and compensation decisions were being made. HR was often viewed as ineffective in addressing employee concerns and was not widely trusted as a neutral resource. Frequent shifts in priorities created substantial rework and made it difficult for teams to execute against long-term goals. Employee feedback was regularly requested but often appeared to have little impact on leadership decisions. Burnout was common, and workloads rarely reflected available resources. The company has a strong product and many talented people, but leadership practices and organizational structure significantly impact the employee experience. Candidates should ask detailed questions about performance reviews, management turnover, employee retention, and how leadership communicates during difficult periods. The answers will be very revealing.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All