Hope you like working long hours. - Anonymous employee Steadily Employee Review

3.0
Dec 23, 2021
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Earning potential is great. Fairly simple straightforward job. Tech is great and we work with engineers closely to improve systems.

Cons

You're working 55 hours weekly minimum but you will find yourself working about 60 to 65 hours to hit their ever-changing goal. This waters down your salary to about 19 per hour. They are sticklers for trustpilot reviews and can (actually have fired) because of a bad review. Not a lot of work/life balance when you have to work those hours. Health insurance subsidy is a joke .

avatar
Steadily Response
4y
Thank you for your feedback; we will always consider constructive feedback as a way for us to become better. We try to be as up front as possible in the interview process about the intensity level that we work at so that candidates can decide for themselves if early stage startup is the right fit for them. We also believe in paying top of market for talent with cash-heavy salaries so team members can choose where to spend their money which is why our benefits subsidy is just average.

Explore other reviews about Steadily

5.0
Feb 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Amazing team, worked with some of the hardest working people in my career. The company is doing great things and building a great product. I truly enjoyed the people I worked with every day, finding that in a job can be difficult. I always felt like I was learning new things from different teams and continuing to grow in my career.

Cons

Work/Life balance - this is made very clear in the hiring process. You will work a lot of hours to keep up with the intensity.

1
2.0
Jun 3, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Salaried pay on the higher end of the market - If you're an individual contributor within the company and happy with your salary, you will be fine - Team leads and colleagues on the floor are knowledgeable and supportive

Cons

- You will suffer middle management if your role is volume / metric based - Middle management is a mix of subject matter experts with little leadership skills, or people leaders with no insurance background - There is little accountability for middle management, and they are apathetic to the needs of their direct reports - If you do not already have a background in insurance, you will not receive appropriate training to succeed in your role - Trainers are just that, they are not teachers or subject matter experts - Reporting and metrics are often not accurate, and management is not equipped to properly analyze their data - There is no metric or data transparency per the above, and data experts from other departments control this tracking - QA metrics are a constantly moving goalpost that accommodate management needs and downplay individual successes

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All