New CEO is a joke - Anonymous employee Stamped Employee Review

1.0
Dec 9, 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

No pros anymore, they're all gone.

Cons

The new CEO is shockingly unqualified and just relies on AI to placate him and tell him he's great while he posts absolute nonsense on LinkedIn to feel important. Fired the CTO to put someone with zero engineering experience as CPO without a CTO? Company hasn't had a growth month in years but let's make the VP of Revenue the COO? I feel bad for the talented employees because the management is comically awful and it's too late to make any meaningful changes to the company. What a disaster. Like everyone else, I'm just collecting my paycheck, working like 3 hours a week max (not that leadership would ever noticed because they're incompetent) and looking to get out soon.

Explore other reviews about Stamped

5.0
Dec 12, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- A great team environment, managers are extremely helpful and supportive without being overbearing - Leadership truly cares and wants the best for the company, even when hard decisions have to be made

Cons

- There have been a lot of changes recently which leads to some confusion about the direction of things

1.0
Mar 4, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Fully remote company - Small company means it is easy to have visible impact

Cons

- New leadership came in, fired existing leadership and laid off 40% of the company, 80% of which was in the eng department. This was done without an understanding of the technical space and so now they're drowning in issues they didn't know existed. - Fixing fundamental problems was put off for years already and is now becoming an insurmountable issue. - Leadership is more focused on drinking the AI-is-everything kool-aid than fixing real problems for existing customers while not having the ability to add worthwhile new features to the existing dumpster fire of a code base. - When things hit the fan engineering (which somehow was viewed by the rest of the company as "in charge") got blamed for everything despite them fighting for years to be given the opportunity to fix critical legacy issues that severely impacted the ability to deliver new value.

3
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All