Ethical but disconnected founders, overemphasis on process and lousy management - Senior Software Engineer Springboard Employee Review

2.0
Oct 17, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Founders really believe in cultural tenets of the company. No politics (from what is visible) at senior management level Founders are accessible through Slack/Gmail and typically respond in a few hours to a few days duration On time salaries (within first couple of days of the following month) Business model seems viable, they scored decent Series B during ongoing CoVid crisis Some team members are genuinely helpful, they care about your growth and give helpful feedback. As a loophole, if you are a poor/average performer, you are almost likely to sail through as long as you follow the process - because managers love process

Cons

They insert too much process into everything, pragmatism is thrown outside the window almost all the times As a high performer, you are often buttoned down due to frustrating processes and this impacts your growth (career/compensation/etc.) They follow strict salary bands, so good for you if you are poor/average performer because you will get at least what is in the band, but bad if you are high achiever, because you CANNOT get more than the band. Company's processes force you into one size fit all approach where total number of possible sizes are limited. So if you an outlier in a positive way (i.e. you really excel at what you do), you will often be buttoned down due to only limited number of available sizes where you can be fitted Managers are a sham, they don't write code (not even senior management in tech), well at least not better than their reportees. People who don't write code (managers) are responsible for annual appraisals - so highly absurd way of judging - Again, a boon for low/average performers, but a curse for high achievers Everyone loves process, you can use loophole like story point gimmick to show you over achieved and end up gaming the system in your favor. If you want increments and promotions, do what your managers expect - which might or might not be the best thing to do. Some senior team members really rough up other team members, they talk weirdly and they often insult others and their managers don't do anything. So learn to not take insults very seriously and stay away from such jerks Internally too much politics for quarterly awards - people fight for things which has visibility and those who don't, end up never getting any awards no matter how hard or relevant their contributions were. Managers don't care to keep themselves updated neither do they properly report your work to senior management who decide awards/compensation/promotion etc. They are too busy in processes and meetings. Process triumps pragmatism. Common sense is really lacking in senior management.

avatar
Springboard Response
5y
From: VP of People Thank you for taking the time to share your feedback. At Springboard, we have a core value to “take ownership” that is, “responsibility for our successes and failures - not only of our own projects but also those of the larger team.” I want you to know we take ownership for the ways in which you feel we have let you down. As you note, our Founders really believe in the cultural tenets of the company and insulting others is absolutely not tolerated. If you witness situations in which individuals act counter to our core values we ask you to raise it with senior management, People Operations, or any Exec or co-founder so that we can address it. Giving actionable, timely feedback with specific context not only demonstrates our “open, honest, and constructive” value but also helps us improve as a team. Overall we strive to make decisions at Springboard that are rooted in data and fact. We are proud to be both human and pragmatic in our approach to building systems and fixing problems. We're sorry to hear that this was not your experience and will work hard to ensure that our judgement and how we approach things is sensible (while building a company that is trying to do the impossible!). In particular, we’ve developed our compensation bands based on industry research and expertise, and individual appraisals are determined by level and scope of responsibility in addition to performance in the role. We have a twice-annual promotion cycle in addition to our annual compensation review to provide Springboarders opportunities for growth and recognition within our organization. Promotion cycles include 360 reviews to ensure we avoid what you are referencing. As we grow rapidly, we need to strike a fine balance between our values of “strive for excellence” and “decisive and execution oriented.” We don’t always get it right. If you have ideas for what we can start or stop doing to improve our approach, we are always looking for input on how we balance agility and speed with collaboration and supportive processes. Since you are a current team member, I urge you to reach out to me, our leadership or any member of our People Operations team, your Exec or our co-founders so that we can understand more about your concerns and address them more directly. We will also be launching new formal channels for feedback to senior leadership so that we can surface and respond to issues sooner. Thank you again for sharing your concerns with us. I look forward to working together to improve your experience as a Springboarder.

Explore other reviews about Springboard

5.0
Feb 3, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Very welcoming environment and team spirit

Cons

Non i can think of at the moment

3.0
Jan 18, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

As a career coach you manage your own schedule and have use of a variety of tools. There are weekly team meetings, the coaching team has versatile background so there is always someone who is an expert at something. The coaches support one another and truly want to ensure everyone is successful.

Cons

There is a disconnect with the onboarding/sales team who seem to say anything to get students to sign on the dotted line. Telling a person fresh out of high school or even college that they will find a position earning 90k plus is very damaging and sets unrealistic expectations. Many of the entry level students have never held a professional position and that is disheartening when a coach is level setting on what they will actually earn if a position is identified.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All