employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Solano County, California

Is this your company?

A House of Cards - Anonymous employee Solano County, California Employee Review

2.0
Dec 7, 2018
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Wonderful colleagues; slightly higher pay compared to surrounding counties

Cons

Seem to be stuck in continually doing things "they way they've always been done" with most managers being baby boomers who have worked here decades and many new employees who are millennials and GenX-ers. These groups have very different view points of how things can be executed, and many upper managers don't feel comfortable allowing the younger generation creative freedom to try new ways of getting work done. Diiferent bureaus are different within solano county, so the area in which you work makes a huge difference in your experience here. As you would guess, we are often understaffed and 1 employee often does the work of 2 or 3. It is a mundane, outdated, cubicle landscape of gray walls and intermingled conversations (cubicles aren't walls). If you want a job where once you pass probation, you can sit pretty and basically never get fired, this place is for you. But if you want a place where you want your creativity to develop and have autonomy over the work you do, ehhhh...prolly not. Also, not a lot of promotion potential; if you want to advance, you have to apply to the position you want, just like you were an outside applicant; you can only move laterally within the org within your same position to a different bureau.

Explore other reviews about Solano County, California

5.0
Oct 9, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

work life balance, nice co-workers

Cons

none was a great place

2.0
Dec 23, 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Competitive benefits and job security. Some frontline staff are committed and attempt to do good work despite systemic barriers.

Cons

Clinical governance is fundamentally broken. The organization is not physician-led, yet physicians retain full clinical and legal responsibility for patient outcomes while lacking ultimate authority over care decisions. Medical judgment is routinely subordinated to administrative processes that are not grounded in medical training or accountability. Leadership roles are consistently occupied by individuals without adequate preparation in healthcare management or clinical governance. As a result, decisions affecting patient care, staffing, and risk management are often made without an understanding of clinical consequences. Highly trained physicians with relevant expertise are marginalized, while non-clinical priorities dominate. The environment rewards compliance over competence and tolerates mediocrity so long as coverage needs are met. This predictably drives away physicians accustomed to functional, physician-led systems, who tend not to remain long once the structural reality becomes clear. The resulting turnover appears chronic and self-perpetuating rather than transitional.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All