employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Servicon Systems

Is this your company?

Confusion and Inconsistency - Supervisor Servicon Systems Employee Review

2.0
Oct 1, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I liked my co workers. They were motivated but became very disillusioned by low wages from this company. Unless you work a lot of overtime, it would be very difficult to make a living from what they pay their cleaners.

Cons

The company is messy. I worked as a Supervisor and found that corporate does not support the cleaners. Ultimately, the company is concerned about getting more contracts /clients but don't do much to keep the workers they have. Over the course that I was there, I had never worked in a place where so many people come and go. At one point. I had questions about my benefits and the woman in benefits just asked me to email her.. after multiple calls and emails, I could never get ahold of her. They dont seem to know what's going on and I'm very glad that I was able to leave this company.

Explore other reviews about Servicon Systems

5.0
Apr 9, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great company to work for

Cons

You must be patient with management

2.0
Feb 10, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Corporate office in heart of Culver City, decent benefits.

Cons

Family dynamics within leadership significantly impacted compliance consistency and decision-making. Mid-to-senior leadership capability was underdeveloped, which created operational and people-risk gaps. The manager overseeing this role used a highly hands-on, micromanagement style that limited autonomy and slowed execution, which felt misaligned with expectations typically set for senior-level HR roles. Work direction was also sometimes routed through more junior team members rather than directly through the senior HR role, which created inefficiencies and role clarity issues. Travel requirements were not transparently communicated during the hiring process. The role required approximately 85–90% weekly (2 days in office all other days at sites) local travel across multiple sites in a single day, including late evening and night visits for later shifts, without practical consideration for traffic or recovery time. Despite extended travel days, early next-day availability was still expected. HR was understaffed relative to operational demands, with a 24/7 support mindset but limited team capacity. There was no formal onboarding plan for the role and little clarity around scope, priorities, or success measures. Internal HR team communication often lacked professional structure and confidentiality discipline, which at times reduced alignment and trust.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All