Skip to contentSkip to footer
      employer cover photo

      Senate Foreign Relations Committee

      Is this your company?

      Senate Foreign Relations Committee reviews

      Great internship Experience - Internship Senate Foreign Relations Committee Employee Review

      5.0
      Aug 14, 2015
      Internship
      Recommend
      CEO approval
      Business outlook

      Pros

      It's the best way to really experience the Hill, but in an international relations environment. You'll focus on one subcommittee so you'll get real experience in one region. The best part of the internship was the amount of interesting and official meetings I was able to sit in on.

      Cons

      Not as much research experience as I had hoped. Your experience also really depended on what subcommittee you worked for because every Legislative Assistant was different regarding the amount of work they gave to interns.

      Explore other reviews about Senate Foreign Relations Committee

      5.0
      Feb 23, 2025
      Internship
      Recommend
      CEO approval
      Business outlook

      Pros

      Great staff and lots of hands on opportunities are provided to interns. This is a real opportunity for growth and is worth it.

      Cons

      The internship is unpaid and depending on the policy team you are placed in, the hours can exceed those outlined in your internship agreement.

      5.0
      Sep 8, 2024
      Intern
      Recommend
      CEO approval
      Business outlook

      Pros

      Staffers truly make time to focus on your learning experience.

      Cons

      Being assigned to only one portfolio team makes it difficult to learn from all the staffers.

      See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All
      Related searches: Senate Foreign Relations Committee jobs | Senate Foreign Relations Committee salaries | Senate Foreign Relations Committee benefits | Senate Foreign Relations Committee interviews
      Senate Foreign Relations Committee reviewsSenate Foreign Relations Committee Internship reviewsSenate Foreign Relations Committee review