racially separated and will ruin your career - Senior Big Data Engineer Selective Insurance Employee Review

1.0
Sep 15, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

nothing to be mentioned as pros

Cons

i worked here as full time employee with my work visa, during initial days i noticed people were ignoring me and talking irrelevant, later i felt isolated as i was the only person in my team, my manager asked me to interact with other people in different team who sits beside me and asked me to teach them the technology and hire them into my team, coworkers from other teams frequently harassed me to teach and hire them into my team, as i was busy with my work i could not encourage them and after an year i realized that my co workers are interested in my job, and the people who i was dealing with are even more racist, i got trapped into something unusual and they revoked my visa , which ruined my career, my manager who is VP ,management and employees are very much racially separated that they encourage people to take over my position and i was left without job with revoked visa and struggled lot to survive , some stuff at my work place were missing and some were sent broken, i would suggest never go to this place. When ever there is any event i noticed people with different race are separated and management never involve people from other race to get involved. higher level management including VP and not trustable.

avatar
Selective Insurance Response
5y
This is not the experience we expect for our employees. Thank you for sharing your thoughts, and you're encouraged to contact your former HR Manager to discuss further so we can review.

Explore other reviews about Selective Insurance

5.0
Apr 17, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Strong but difficult leadership during transformation.

Cons

Relocation causing some some concern

2
1.0
May 26, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Decent benefits and decent coworkers

Cons

Working at Selective was a toxic work environment shaped by favoritism, excessive workload expectations, and poor boundaries around employee availability. Management often applied expectations unevenly, which created a lack of fairness and accountability. High performance did not always seem to be the primary factor in decision-making, which undermined trust in leadership. There was also a strong “big fish, small pond” dynamic, where internal status and informal influence often carried more weight than actual performance or collaboration. This contributed to a highly political environment where trust between colleagues was limited and information did not always feel safe to share openly. Employees were expected to be available far beyond normal working hours, creating an unsustainable “always on” culture with no real work-life balance. The workload was consistently too high for the compensation provided. Internal politics further interfered with day-to-day work and made collaboration more difficult than it needed to be. In practice, this environment often encouraged self-preservation over teamwork, which made it difficult to build trust or rely on others consistently. Overall, the environment was not structured in a way that supported long-term employee wellbeing or retention. This is not a workplace that supports a healthy work-life balance. For me, the experience felt unsustainable, and over time it became clear that the environment was not conducive to long-term growth or wellbeing.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All