employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Sedgewick Homes

Is this your company?

Sales professional - Sales Associate Sedgewick Homes Employee Review

2.0
Nov 28, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Beautiful model homes with high quality materials

Cons

Monthly base of $2800 per month. We were living on food stamps to buy groceries for our kids. They're very protective of their home prices and it was very hard to push sales through due to higher prices than all the competition around us. It's easy for the people higher on the totem pole with cushy salaries to forget what it's like to work so many hours for such meager earnings. There needs to be major changes in the industry. This business really only caters to the company and not its sales people who provide the means for the salary employees.

avatar
Sedgewick Homes Response
9y
At Sedgewick Homes we have a very thorough and detailed hiring process with communication about the compensation package including commissions. Our sales positions are not different from other sales roles and are compensated based on a tiered sale structure. It is always disappointing when we have staff that are unable to be successful in this industry and unfortunately some are not able to assess and explain the myriad of differences between us and other builders. Reviewing builders pricing and assessing the differences definitely takes time to build expertise in and we do our very best to assist with that with the necessary resources and more than 50 years of combined experience of our management team. We appreciate the feedback and are always willing to be introspective to provide an encouraging, successful work environment for all of our employees.

Explore other reviews about Sedgewick Homes

5.0
Dec 8, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Stayed strong in an ever changing year.

Cons

None that come to mind.

1.0
Feb 13, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Potential to grow, but very unlikely.

Cons

Unfortunately, my experience with this team was disappointing. There was no clear ownership of responsibilities, limited strategic alignment, and frequent breakdowns in communication. Decision-making felt reactive rather than structured, and cross-functional collaboration lacked cohesion. A stronger governance process and clearer leadership alignment would significantly improve performance and morale.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All