Not Good. - Anonymous employee Scholastic Employee Review

2.0
Apr 13, 2016
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

-Great Mission - getting books in the hands of kids is noble (profitable, but noble). -Smart co-workers - you'll work with a lot of intelligent folks who know and love what they do. -If you're lucky enough to work with authors, this can be one of the most rewarding professional experiences of your career. I know it was for me. -Location - right in the heart of Soho. I didn't like the neighborhood, but many people do. -Occasional perks like free books or movie screenings. It's actually harder to get the books you want than you might think. -Company has been around a LONG time and has a great reputation in schools. Their book fairs are things of legend and will always be the first thing people mention when you say that you work there.

Cons

-Company is very siloed; inter-departmental rivalries are not just common, they are the rule rather than the exception. It's hard to get things done here unless you really reach across the aisle and make friends. Issues can go unresolved for years because of this. -Very poor management - managers are all too often concerned with their own advancement and agenda rather than nurturing and retaining talent. There is no oversight of poor managers and how they treat their employees and as a result, Scholastic has a major case of brain drain, where talented employees are running, not walking, to better roles elsewhere. -Little to no opportunities for advancement or promotion. -Favoritism/cronyism is rampant here. If you're lucky enough to get a boss who likes and supports you, bully! If not, you're boned. -Scholastic is loaded with "lifers," who have had just the one job there for their entire career, and "boomerangs," who perpetually leave and come back because they are ill-equipped to survive anywhere else. This leaves them blind to the evolving workplace and stuck in ruts that they cannot climb out of. -Layoffs are common and happen with no notice - they literally liquidated an entire division in a month. -The company is very cliquish - this happens in multiple departments and is more common with certain job types than others. -The benefits keep getting more expensive for employees as Scholastic covers less every year. -Comparatively, Scholastic pays around 30% less than what you should be actually earning in the real world. Know your value and negotiate if you can. -The building is nice (they even have a youtube tour of it) but they are embarking on a two year renovation of the entire building which is turning everyone's work life upside-down. Scholastic is moving to an open office plan - if you've worked in one, you know that they are a disaster and make it very difficult to actually get work done without the aid of headphones. 95% of people who had offices will not have one after the construction is done. Some employees are being moved to an off-site building while others are being asked to stay and work in the building while it's under construction. The update is overdue but will be a huge distraction to the mostly hard-working rank and file.

Explore other reviews about Scholastic

5.0
Jun 26, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

positive working environment, good people

Cons

great company to work for; no complaints

2.0
Jun 11, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Remote work and the clients are very nice to work with.

Cons

In my experience, the company's compensation practices lacked transparency and accountability. When employees asked questions about how their earnings, bonuses, or compensation were calculated, clear answers were often difficult to obtain. Decisions affecting employee pay were made without adequate explanation, and requests for clarification frequently went unresolved. What I found particularly concerning was the apparent disconnect between employee compensation outcomes and management compensation. Employees regularly experienced reduced bonuses or earnings, while management and executive leadership appeared largely unaffected by the same business decisions. This created the perception that the financial impact of those decisions was being borne primarily by employees rather than those making them. After repeatedly seeking explanations and receiving few meaningful answers, I lost confidence in the fairness and transparency of the compensation process.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All