Great learning opportunities, but fast-paced and demanding workload - Software Engineer Safe Security Employee Review

3.0
Jun 13, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

1. Good learning opportunities – Employees get exposure to multiple technologies and are encouraged to work with modern tools and frameworks, enabling continuous skill development. 2. Good culture of transparency and collaboration – There is open communication across all levels of the organization, making it easy to understand ongoing initiatives and connect with colleagues or leaders whenever needed. 3. Flexible leave and work arrangements – Along with an unlimited vacation policy, employees have the flexibility to work remotely during emergencies when needed. 4. Regular knowledge-sharing sessions – Monthly brown bag sessions provide a platform for developers to share technical challenges, solutions, and new learnings, helping the entire team stay aligned and grow together.

Cons

1. Fast-paced work environment – The company operates at a high speed with frequent project deliveries and product launches, which can sometimes make it challenging to maintain a consistent work-life balance. 2. High workload during critical releases – Back-to-back projects and major launches may occasionally require extended hours or weekend work to meet business timelines, making the workload demanding during peak periods.

Explore other reviews about Safe Security

5.0
Apr 21, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Genuinely category-defining work in cyber risk - from CRQ, TPRM to CTEM — not marketing fluff, real outcomes for CISOs. Fast-paced, intellectually stimulating environment where good ideas win regardless of who they come from. Leadership is accessible, decisive, and transparent about where the company is headed and why.

Cons

Moving fast means priorities can shift; comfort with ambiguity is a real requirement, not a cliché. The bar is high and the pace is relentless; not the right fit for someone looking to coast.

6
1.0
May 3, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Some individual engineers/other employees were genuinely helpful and kind.

Cons

The company somehow has both heavy processes and constant urgency, which produces chaos instead of structure. Leadership frequently calls the organization a “family” and claims to be transparent, but communication is selective and decisions happen behind closed doors. Engineering culture is defined by constant overwork and subtle pressure to offload tasks onto others just to stay afloat. You spend as much time defending your workload and deadlines as you do actually building anything. The CEO’s mindset feels stuck in 2015—there are frequent “Ferrari” metaphors, “work harder” rhetoric, and at one point, even a story shared in a surprisingly celebratory tone about a former employee who worked himself into a heart attack. This fits a broader pattern: a strong emphasis on minimizing short-term costs rather than making decisions with long-term stability or scalability in mind, which raises questions about the company’s longer-term direction. A significant number of US engineers had already been quitting because the workload and expectations were identical across regions while the compensation didn’t come close to matching US cost of living; unlike in India, labor protections and broader opportunities made leaving a more realistic option. The US engineering layoffs were ultimately explained as a reaction to several managers quitting, yet they came directly on the heels of this wave of voluntary departures. This also matters when reading reviews, since employee experiences and incentives can differ significantly by region.

6
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All