employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Rex Healthcare

Part of UNC Health

Is this your company?

Going down, people leaving in droves - Social Worker Rex Healthcare Employee Review

2.0
Nov 10, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I love my patients and my co-workers but things have been rapidly declining in the last 1-2 years even faster in the last 6 months.

Cons

Big changes in leadership and in what leadership holds as the most important thing. People and our patients used to be the most important, and always doing the right thing. Now it is money. Plain and simple. Resources have been slashed to the point that every department is struggling to keep their head above water. This applies to entities beyond main campus as well where the effects are being felt tremendously. I loved working at Rex because I felt like I was working towards the greater good and making a difference. Now that feeling is no longer there. Many co-workers have voiced that they feel they are on a “sinking ship”. Things just keep getting worse and there is no support from management or leadership other than the constant threat that more cuts are coming. I also want to speak to a culture of lack of accountability. No one seems to want to take control or responsibility for anything. The people that get promoted or offered advancement seems random or that they may have personal connections. Co-workers who work hard are not rewarded and those who don’t are not reprimanded. Very sad things have gone this way.

Explore other reviews about Rex Healthcare

5.0
Jan 19, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Enjoy working at Rex Hospital.

Cons

Only con is using pto for holiday pay. Not the worst thing.

1.0
Jun 15, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

None. I would not return to this hospital or recommend others to work there.

Cons

UNC Rex has the potential to be a strong organization, but my experience was that the culture is heavily influenced by politics, hierarchy, and longevity rather than competence or innovation. Advancement into leadership positions often appeared to be based more on popularity and time served than demonstrated leadership ability or clinical excellence. Having worked in higher-acuity healthcare environments, I found the nursing scope of practice at Rex to be unnecessarily restrictive. Many policies felt arbitrary and created barriers to providing efficient patient care. There was significant red tape surrounding even routine processes, making it difficult to implement improvements or practice at the top of one's license. Communication was one of the organization's biggest weaknesses. Poor communication between departments, leadership, and frontline staff frequently created frustration and inefficiencies. Staff concerns were often acknowledged but rarely addressed in a meaningful way, and management did not consistently advocate for bedside nurses when challenges arose. The culture was resistant to change, even when proposed improvements were evidence-based and intended to benefit patients or staff. Individuals who attempted to challenge the status quo or introduce new ideas often encountered resistance rather than collaboration. There was a noticeable tendency for people to become territorial over processes and responsibilities, making constructive change difficult. Compensation was also significantly below what would be expected given the demands placed on nursing staff and was not competitive with many comparable healthcare organizations in the region. Overall, my experience was that the organization values maintaining existing structures more than fostering innovation, professional growth, or empowering frontline clinicians. For nurses who are comfortable with a highly structured environment and limited autonomy, it may be a good fit. For those seeking a progressive culture, strong nursing advocacy, and opportunities to drive meaningful change, it may be frustrating.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All