Shockingly Toxic - Anonymous employee Rethink Food Employee Review

2.0
Jan 12, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Decent pay, great HR, and a good mission to get behind.

Cons

It takes a lot for somebody want to write a negative review on a Glassdoor post for a great non-profit, yet here we are. They will gaslight you into thinking you have all the benefits in the world and then gaslight you and move the goalposts down the road to make your life miserable. CEO means well but it’s just a chaotic and unorganized mess of an organization. He desperately needs a better culinary director and more emphasis on training and setting his team up for success. Not to mention the only positive review on here is from the current Culinary c suite leader who shamelessly just posted a false advertisement for how the company treats its own people. The difference in quality of attention given to the office folks and the culinary folks was nothing short of infuriating and disrespectful. Do not work here.

Explore other reviews about Rethink Food

5.0
Feb 9, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Go getters with bold ideas tend to thrive. The free lunch is a big plus. The team is very friendly and seems to enjoy working together. Senior leadership is very accessible and open to feedback. Not too many meetings.

Cons

If you require a lot of structure you will not do well here. You need to think fast and move fast. The typical nonprofit bureaucracy does not apply here.

4.0
Feb 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Mission + impact: The mission is strong and the work is genuinely inspiring—supporting local communities while building partnerships that are thoughtfully designed to be mutually beneficial for the people served and the providers/partners delivering services. Bold, solutions-first culture: This is a “go-getter” environment. People with big ideas and a bias toward action tend to thrive. The organization pushes boundaries and isn’t afraid to rethink how things are done to improve outcomes. Team culture: The team is friendly, collaborative, and it feels like people enjoy working together. Accessible leadership: Senior leadership is visible, approachable, and generally open to feedback, which can be rare and valuable in nonprofits. Operational pace: There aren’t endless meetings—there’s a strong focus on execution. Less bureaucracy: If you’ve been slowed down by traditional nonprofit red tape, you’ll likely appreciate that the typical bureaucracy doesn’t apply here. Comp + support: Pay is decent, HR is strong, and the benefits/perks (including free lunch) are a real plus.

Cons

Management approach is still maturing: As a growing organization, leadership and people-management practices are evolving. Some teams would benefit from more consistent management rhythms, clearer ownership, and stronger support structures as the org scales. Communication can take extra effort: Information can move quickly and across many stakeholders, so staying aligned sometimes requires proactive follow-up and strong self-management. Workload + growth-stage intensity: The pace is high and the workload can be heavy. It’s a dynamic environment, but it can feel intense—especially during periods of rapid growth or change.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All