Skip to contentSkip to footer
      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      Research to Practice

      Is this your company?

      Research to Practice reviews

      Don't Bother Working Here - Anonymous employee Research to Practice Employee Review

      1.0
      Jul 5, 2012
      Anonymous employee
      Recommend
      CEO approval
      Business outlook

      Pros

      Great coworkers, decent benefits, good location

      Cons

      - CEO walks around with a God complex - CEO/managers are extremely condescending, do not give credit when credit is due, and are quick to throw others under the bus to cover up his/her incompetence and/or lack of awareness on the issue - Company atmosphere is one big blame game - No trust between CEO/managers and employees = all office communication is through email = 100 plus daily emails = an inefficient use of time during the work day = weekend work - Not structured to allow for growth; only pile on more work (plus hours) and call it a "promotion" - Set insanely high expectations, and when met, are often followed by unappreciative or no feedback

      Explore other reviews about Research to Practice

      5.0
      Jan 10, 2021
      Proofreader
      Recommend
      CEO approval
      Business outlook

      Pros

      Everyone I have worked with has been so nice and helpful

      Cons

      none to note at this time!

      1
      1.0
      Oct 1, 2023
      Grant manager
      Recommend
      CEO approval
      Business outlook

      Pros

      The entire company is remote, so you can work from home

      Cons

      -No transparency on the inner workings of the company, particularly financial. -Contracts say there is no pharmaceutical marketing, but they prioritize showcasing the drugs of companies who have funded programs. -When someone leaves the company, they don't hire they just pile more work on current employees with no pay increase. -There is pressure to be on call 24/7 and drop everything if the CEO needs something. -There is minimal upward mobility and little room for change or sharing constructive feedback. -Their operations systems are quite poor - no database, just lots of repetitive spreadsheets. -Leadership is very passive aggressive, with no clear communication on agendas/action items/directives for meetings. -The company is run by people who've been in leadership for decades or are part of the founder's family. These individuals get priority in decision making, but do not have the professional development growth trajectory to back it up. -Also the one HR professional also manages the founder's personal properties. Felt like a conflict of interest.

      5
      See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All
      Related searches: Research to Practice jobs | Research to Practice salaries | Research to Practice benefits | Research to Practice interviews
      Research to Practice reviewsResearch to Practice review