Pros
Staff is absolutely great and are forming a union to challenge terrible leadership
Cons
The only decision makers at the organization are three white men. They decide where the money goes, who is hired or fired, and what projects are worked on. The “successful” employees are those who follow the orders of these men, and others employees are shut out, reprimanded, or even fired for voicing disagreement, even if it’s with the organization’s best interest in mind. This can be psychologically traumatizing as those same individuals in leadership champion “radical candor” during staff meetings and make statements about valuing diversity, equity, and inclusion without making any effort to improve workplace climate. Even without all that, leadership has totally failed to structure an organization capable of scaling a national movement in democracy reform, and are only focused on making flashy celebrity videos and policy wins they can claim as their own, regardless of how much they actually impacted the reform.
