I should've paid attention to theranos comparison in previous glassdoor review - Senior Research Associate Rejuvenate Bio Employee Review

1.0
Mar 14, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

free food, good fellow research associates

Cons

As a whole, disorganized and scientifically unethical. The majority of scientists and upper management have no idea what they are doing regarding basic molecular biology, or how to design a good, stable construct. Roles are often not what they are explicitly described as during hiring. There is little potential for growth or position change despite many false promises. Scientific methods and business practices are highly unconventional for industry standards. Cost shortcuts are taken that result in failed products, and lower level employees are expected to pick up the slack. Sloppy science results in major ethical flaws. I will stress again the issue with scientific ethics at this company. The claims in the news articles are false and based on bad, sloppy science.

Explore other reviews about Rejuvenate Bio

5.0
Apr 14, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

great work environment and vision

Cons

Currently in pre-clinical phase but moving towards clinical trials

1.0
Aug 16, 2023
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

They have free food every Wednesday and have a wide selection of snacks available in the kitchen. Overall, the people are nice and smart individuals. Majority of the staff seem passionate about their research and sincerely want to contribute to the company’s mission and goals.

Cons

One of the most significant challenges was the apparent inexperience of the leadership team. It was clear that some key decision-makers lacked the necessary industry knowledge and expertise to navigate the complexities of the biotech industry effectively. Management played favorites and bonuses/raises/promotions were inconsistent and unfair. The company's financial instability was a major concern and unfortunately, it resulted in a series of layoffs. Leadership was also not as transparent as they could have been regarding our ongoing financial struggles. All-hands meetings gave a façade that everything was fine when it truly was not. There were a lot of questionable hires that did not make sense based on our pre-clinical phase. Furthermore, I was concerned about the laboratory standards that, at times, seemed non-existent. Management did not display an understanding of data integrity and this casted doubts on the reliability of our results. Proper PPE was often overlooked, putting the safety of employees at risk, which is simply unacceptable in a scientific setting.

3
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All