Very good in so many areas; lackluster in so many others. - Anonymous employee Radancy Employee Review

3.0
Oct 27, 2015
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

TMP has many some extraordinarily talented and passionate people. For the recruitment communications niche, TMP has its share of visionaries, and it has been ahead of the game in terms of the adoption and development of digital media and technological solutions. In the larger sense, the company definitely knows what it is doing and is often very good or excellent in making their clients look good. Middle management is generally pretty flexible and understanding.

Cons

I would give the company a 2 1/2 star rating if I could, but I'll round up. There is not enough trust by the CEO in Executive and Regional management to be allowed to run their offices. There is only a vague sense of what is to come next, and it seems like the company doesn't stick to its roadmap. Often, the company goes to market on technological offerings that are not ready for primetime which hurts TMP's reputation. Training is bad, and although what it is better than it used to be, it still awful. There is ZERO career path; I can't emphasize that enough. There is a fair amount of cronyism while smart, hard-working people get overlooked and overworked. TMP is a revenue-driven organization - meaning that the bottom line is more important than all other considerations in all cases. The company has simply spread itself too thin and is trying to become all things to all clients rather than focusing on being excellent in a few key areas.

Explore other reviews about Radancy

5.0
May 1, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great place to grow, flexible with family matters and a good work life balance. Learned a lot. Flexible time off is a good perk.

Cons

The rebrand removed a lot of personality from the company which made it hard to service legacy clients.

1
2.0
May 17, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The people and direct coworkers were genuinely supportive and collaborative. Many employees were dealing with similar challenges, which created a strong sense of teamwork and willingness to help each other. Despite broader organizational issues, most teams worked hard and tried to support one another however they could.

Cons

Leadership doesn’t seem to have a clear direction for the company, so priorities and decisions were constantly changing. A lot of decisions would get made and then completely reversed a few months later, which made it hard to feel confident in anything long term. There were also a lot of staffing and restructuring changes without proper training or support, so people were basically expected to figure things out as they went. The company became very focused on enforcing in-office policies and making sure people were physically at their desks, while employees hadn’t received raises in years despite heavier workloads and inflation. That disconnect was really discouraging and definitely contributed to burnout. Burnout was something constantly talked about across teams, but it rarely felt like anything meaningful was done to actually support employees or improve workloads. A lot of employees were also expected to sell or support products they didn’t fully believe in, which made it hard to feel set up for success from the beginning.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All