Hong Kong office’s management team (who worked over 10 years) should be removed thoroughly. - Marketing Assistant RICS Employee Review

1.0
Jun 22, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good branding with lots of professional and senior members to be the framework.

Cons

HK office is occupied by incapable management- those who have been working in Hong Kong office over 10 years has no business strategies at all; attached with the old mindset, they do not welcome for the new business ideas. With such kind of Director and Managers, don’t expect RICS HK will be growing positively and it is even difficult to maintain the current scale.

avatar
RICS Response
7y
It’s concerning to hear that you had a negative experience. This is not the environment we want for our employees and if you would like to give me more information we can look into this in more detail. Please contact me at feedback@rics.org. Alistair Milne, Director of People and Corporate Responsibility

Explore other reviews about RICS

4.0
Oct 19, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Flexible Remote work Non problematic Colleagues and managers were kind and helpful

Cons

UK team would take their time to respond to our regional team delaying our time management and projects Not very easy to grow in the company

4
avatar
RICS Response
4y
Thank you for your feedback about your time and RICS and your appreciation of our flexible working policy as well as the kindness shown by colleagues and managers alike. We welcome all feedback from former and current employees so we can grow together and face new challenges successfully. We are committed to driving positive changes and we have already taken a number of measures responding to feedback and recommendations to help us achieve this.
2.0
Aug 6, 2014
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Exposure to high level professionals in the property profession, annual professional development course, and good benefits package.

Cons

The local office leadership is lacking in a way that is detrimental to the success of the organization. There's a lack of direction, death by meetings - which usually ends with no further action being taken, the Managing Director's ego is inflated and he has yet to deliver on annual membership acquisition goals, male-centric US office environment, blatant bias, and a lack of transparency. Management is secretive and shady. Outdated software and poor technical support.

5
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All