Political, do not recommend - Product Manager Quizlet Employee Review

1.0
Dec 8, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

*Attempting to make a difference in education *People recognize the product *Some decent people passionate about education

Cons

*Obvious cheating platform *This company is unabashedly political and it is demonstrated in the promotions and dispersal of work responsibilities. If you look around the company you will see people managers unqualified for their roles in leadership . *Processes are slow and delayed by the amount of decision makers needing to align (politics). The decision makers are also chosen based on favoritism. A lot of decision making happens outside of team meetings between leads and their favorites. *Climbers. The company has people who are hungry for status and it affects the culture.

Explore other reviews about Quizlet

5.0
Mar 13, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

great people, good work culture, professional, flexible,

Cons

Hard to fully integrate as a contractor

1.0
Jun 16, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

There was a community of talented, caring individuals (ICs and middle management) who supported each other and were passionate about shipping quality features for Quizlet's users.

Cons

- There has been no strategy for years. If there ever is one, it veers mid-quarter. Work assignments veer accordingly. Then leadership blames anyone but themselves when productivity tanks. - The CEO and his army of VPs brought "Amazon/Google accountability" to engineering, and want to drive out what they see as a bunch of low performers. They demonstrate zero ability to distinguish between "low performer" and "mvp". So they drove out most of the mvps. That's in consumer experience engineering btw. There is a smoking crater where the Data & AI org used to be. - The CPO did nothing for years except kill the ideas of his product managers. No ideas, no direction, no support. - Leadership has massive fomo about alleged AI productivity. They measure it with poorly correlated metrics like commits, PRs, lines of code written etc. They keep deciding they haven't replaced enough "low performers" with AI. They’re desperate to drive two or three new features a week, and so they have driven the company into the ground.

3
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All