Low pay, intimidation, and harassment are common at PP. - Teacher Project Place Employee Review

1.0
Nov 15, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

*Healthcare is good. *Clients are great. *The Assistant Director and Director of Reentry are wonderful human beings.

Cons

Project Place is quite possibly the most toxic environment that I have ever been in. If you want to work in an environment where you feel heard and seen, PLEASE go somewhere else... Everyone essentially gets paid well below what they're worth and admin has no concrete plans to boost pay. For three decades the ED was emotionally abusive to her employees, which included yelling at people, calling them names, and minimizing, ignoring, and contributing to various forms of harassment. Over the summer the staff tried to band together to challenge the ED and Board for abusing their power. They did so by writing a series of open letters - to which - the ED harassed them and threatened them in response. This is a very predatory work environment. It wasn't until I left did I realize how messed up this place is. Staff is not inclusive or diverse in terms of race, sexual orientation, or gender. There are only like 30 employees at PP. Yet there are like 5 "directors," regardless of their experience or qualifications. It's a running joke in the office. They're a dime a dozen. PLEASE - IF YOU ARE INTERESTED IN PRESERVING YOUR MENTAL HEALTH - THINK TWICE BEFORE WORKING AT PP. *Caveat: After a lot of pushback, the Board appointed a new ED. She seems very sweet and it's obvious that she wants to turn things around for the better. She has a lot on her plate but I am absolutely certain that in the next two years or so, PP will be a better place. But for now, nooooo.

Explore other reviews about Project Place

5.0
Aug 9, 2022
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Respectful and supportive colleagues Friendly supervisors

Cons

Salary: non-directors are not paid well.

1
2.0
May 31, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

the clients; working at Roxbury Community College and the Reggie Lewis Center

Cons

I was hired as a kitchen supervisor in the Working Opportunities For Women program, and told during two interviews that I’d really be needed in 1.) daily kitchen work production, cafeteria and event catering at Roxbury Community College, and 2.) in working with our clients—women coming from different varieties of hardship, and trying to enter the workforce in kitchens—in learning how to follow and implement recipes, and to produce high volume results for daily college cafeteria customers and concessions at the Reggie Lewis Center. I happily accepted—and the women I worked WITH remain the best thing about this program. The women I worked FOR—collectively, a bunch of smug, white, mostly college-educated managerial people who use their good intentions as an excuse to be completely clueless about how to run a kitchen cleanly or produce ServSafe-compliant fresh meals—were an utter nightmare of inefficiency, who wasted unbelievable amounts of time in nitpicking and unnecessarily disciplining the language and behavior of the clients (mostly women of color) and dropping them from this program if they displayed what was vaguely described in circulated evaluations as a “bad attitude,” or “spoke too loudly” or “used inappropriate language” during shifts, or had the temerity to make themselves an off-menu sandwich to feed themselves during or after a shift. I was hired with 6 years of experience in high volume bakeries and kitchens, and a 20-year career in teaching, but if you accept this position, recognize that you will not actually be able to supervise, or train women for kitchen and restaurant work, while utilizing any kind of accumulated knowledge and experience. An uninformed, seniority-obsessed manager with no real food service, cook, or cheffing experience will get in the way, and actively inhibit new recipes, from-scratch meals, and any education from taking place. The goal here seems to be to train women for fast-food work, and in prepping heavily-processed foods, but ironically to train them BADLY for these responsibilities: any of the clients I met would have learned more about clean, organized food production from a first day as a McDonald’s trainee than they learned from three months with this smug, clueless, well-intentioned but fundamentally petty and condescending program.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All