employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Phillips Medisize

Part of Molex

Engaged employer

Micromanagement and favoritism hinder career growth - Anonymous employee Phillips Medisize Employee Review

2.0
Jul 2, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

It sounds good on paper.

Cons

I, along with others like me, joined this company with significant experience, expecting to be trusted to do my job. Instead, I found an environment defined by excessive micromanagement, where autonomy is limited regardless of an employee's background or expertise. Career advancement appears to be driven more by favoritism than performance or talent, making it difficult for hardworking employees to see a clear path for growth. While there are genuinely talented and supportive people throughout the organization, many of the best employees either choose to leave or are ultimately pushed out. Compensation is another area where the company falls short. The salary structure is not competitive with the market, and there are no meaningful bonus opportunities or incentives to reward strong performance. There are good people working here, but the company's culture and some leaders make it difficult to recommend as a long-term place to build a career. Think twice.

Explore other reviews about Phillips Medisize

5.0
Oct 1, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Compensation Benefits Paid Time Off Culture

Cons

Location Competing priorities Scheduling conflicts

2.0
Jan 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The parent company provides good structure and benefits.

Cons

I would recommend considering a short tenure, perhaps no more than two years post-college, primarily for the experience. While the parent company does have a robust structure, the actual policies seem to get lost in a PowerPoint deck and are not practiced within Phillips-Medisize. There’s a pressing need to phase out some long-standing Leaders to enable meaningful change. Management at this organization falls short of what you would expect. The culture feels entrenched in a "good ol' boys club," where micromanagement is disguised as autonomy. Even as an Engineer, you're required to document your tasks on an hourly basis, creating an environment where the focus shifts to producing MS Word documents rather than genuine work outputs. If your Manager visits your site, they usually choose a vantage point where they can observe you all day, rather than utilizing available spaces that may be more comfortable. Training is inadequate; you're thrown into the deep end after completing online computer courses, only to face constant reprimand without proper support. High performers may garner attention and more responsibilities, but this does not translate into bonuses or promotions. The structure for project management is virtually nonexistent—no Agile methodologies or Lean Six Sigma principles are employed. Communication issues are rampant; often, the only Engineer deemed 'in the know' dominates meetings, leaving others in the dark. I was promised that updates regarding my project would be communicated, but this information stagnated before reaching me—despite my role within the project. Furthermore, the compensation here is unacceptably low for the medical device industry. Given that Hudson is now considered a suburb of the Twin Cities, salaries should be adjusted to remain competitive.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All