employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Pew Charitable Trusts

Is this your company?

A culture of fear - Senior Associate Pew Charitable Trusts Employee Review

2.0
Jul 12, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Established funding source from the trusts (as opposed to a complete reliance on fundraising) - Nice location - Beautiful office - Great causes to support - Extremely smart, capable staff (whom management should trust more than they do) - A fun Halloween celebration every year

Cons

Where to begin... basically, all the other reviews you'll read here are true. It's taken me a year to post this because that's how long it took to re-assimilate from the culture of fear. In retrospect, I'm beginning to believe that Pew is just an experiment: Put all the mice in a very shiny cage with nowhere to hide. Pressure the mice to perform. Punish them when they do. Periodically reorganize the cage completely, shuffling beloved senior mice out of the cage in the process and hoping the others won't notice. (They do.) Some specifics: - What I mean by a "culture of fear": Employees are not trusted at all. Everything must go through at least five layers of approval. Even then, there will be reasons to be slapped on the wrist... maybe someone used an adjective in a press interview or wore shoes that exposed both toes and heels. (These are not exaggerations in the slightest.) - Extremely top heavy, with a very vertical structure. Junior employees learn very quickly that they are junior and, as such, not worthy. This extends to all areas of work - including seating. For instance, only senior associates get a cube next to a window. - The ambiance, while pretty, is oppressive. Literally glass doors, when there are doors. (Only one person's office has one.) Meeting rooms like fishbowls. People tasked with running around making sure employees only have one plant and aren't draping their jackets over their chairs or leaving scuffs on the floor. (Again, not kidding.) - Benefits on the decline. The stated reasoning for this was that Pew was too far ahead of the nonprofit pack. However, many of us (myself included) took substantial pay cuts because of the good benefits package. - Arbitrary and inconsistent career advancement policies. Employees are told they can be considered for a promotion after two years. For most, that is true. However, promotions have happened at the senior management level for very new employees. - High turnover. - The two above bullets combined result in junior employees working in multiple positions at once with no possibility of being promoted while doing so. For me, this resulted in working on 5-10 projects for years, only to be promoted to work for just a few of them (dropping the rest). - Extremely complex protocols through tons of different channels.

Explore other reviews about Pew Charitable Trusts

5.0
Jun 22, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great and positive work environment, talented colleagues, flexibility and work life balance

Cons

Slow moving and risk averse

2.0
Feb 9, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Pew offers meaningful opportunities to work on important policy issues, and it has strong resources to support that work. Many colleagues are highly intelligent, capable, and deeply committed to the mission. For people early in their careers or those looking to gain exposure to public policy and research-driven advocacy, Pew can be a valuable place to learn (but not necessarily grow). Benefits are excellent as well.

Cons

The workplace culture is deeply affected by favoritism—advancement and recognition often go to a small, preferred group rather than being based on merit or impact. Rigid processes, layered hierarchy, and risk-averse decision-making make it difficult to innovate or achieve meaningful success. DEI efforts often feel more performative than substantive, with initiatives being quietly diluted or “whitewashed” to avoid political risk under the current administration. While there is a great deal of talent within the organization, the institution as a whole lacks ambition and is often unwilling to push boldly for change. The work environment can be toxic, with sexual and verbal harassment toward younger staff, pervasive microaggressions against people of color, and routine ageist comments. HR does not adequately protect those impacted and instead appears focused on minimizing risk and protecting leadership.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All