Polarizing leadership threatens company - Anonymous employee PeopleKeep Employee Review

2.0
Nov 11, 2019
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The heart of a good company is still here. There are a lot of talented employees who are great to work with and individual departments (to the extent that the manager has latitude over them) can be positive places to grow your career. Brand-new employees may also be happy if they’re a good fit with the new culture – that is, comfortable with a hierarchical leadership style and carrying out marching orders. If work is something where you're happy to just show up, put in your time, and stay out of larger strategic discussions, you'll probably be happy here.

Cons

New leadership uprooted key programs and cultural values to the detriment of the company. Questions weren't asked and time wasn't taken to understand the company, the industry it operates in, or the in-house knowledge of other employees. After an extreme amount of pushback (and a drop in eNPS of 52 points), the new CEO made it clear that anyone unhappy no longer had a place at PeopleKeep. Now left unchecked, management has become thin-skinned and mean-spirited. The approach to conflict resolution is to shut down discussion and exert authority. Extremely negative reactions are common when management is challenged and people who have different opinions are routinely uninvited or excluded from key meetings. Senior leadership exists in an intentionally built echo chamber. All new hires are treated to a smear campaign against former and long-serving employees, who are painted as inflexible and not interested in growth. They’ve been known to talk badly about other employees behind closed doors and post negative statements about them online. There's no willingness to believe that those who disagree with them may actually be arguing in good faith. What may be most concerning for PeopleKeep, though, is the brain drain that’s occurred since the management changes. More than a third of the company has left, taking vital industry and product knowledge with them. Senior leadership has very limited knowledge of the health benefits landscape and an even poorer understanding of how to build software. Struggles with reasonable expectations for the outsourced development team are common, and they routinely stumble over concepts and terminology key to the industry. Overall, PeopleKeep has gone from a company that prized intelligent colleagues engaging in informed discussion to a top-down operation that prizes easy acceptance. The results have already started to appear and they’re not good – crucial product features have malfunctioned and the top competitor has gained an edge that will be difficult to take back.

avatar
PeopleKeep Response
6y
Thank you so much for your candid feedback. We never intended you to feel the way you do, we’re so sorry we caused you to have such a poor experience. We’d like to understand some of your views better so we can change! Can you provide us some insight so we can make adjustments? https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1vGCSXc28fkDVaDTVROMA0CpPFiDoyO7QBrU50xPEKvY/edit

Explore other reviews about PeopleKeep

5.0
Aug 18, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Company has a fundamentally strong business and good people. Feels great to work in a goal-oriented, collaborative environment with a positive remote culture and supportive team. There is a lot of room for developing skills and making an impact. Product is a highly visible, well-managed function here and this offers a unique opportunity for scope by using judgement and making correct decisions.

Cons

People who are not used to having less structure than a traditional company may not realize how essential it is to be proactive and resourceful in order to make an impact in a startup environment.

2.0
Nov 14, 2019
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

There were some great people to work with. There was also a good culture for a while.

Cons

The CEO change mid-year was quite detrimental to the company culture, head count and productivity. In a matter of a month, the majority of the product and engineering team was either let go or told to quit. The remaining few were offered bonuses to stay on (at least through the end of the next product launch), but all left quickly. The exodus still continues. The employee NPS score tanked within 2 months of the new CEO coming on the scene. Given the previous company culture of openness, there were initially hopes that the drop in employee satisfaction would bring some change. Changes came quickly. The culture was dismantled, roughly 1/3 of the company was let go or left, the continuing negative eNPS scores were ignored—not the kind of changes anyone was looking for. As other recent reviews have outlined, distrust is the standard and disagreements (real or imagined) result in being cut out of meetings, decision making, etc. A final important thing to consider: the only recent positive reviews were written by new employees, all of whom were hired directly by the CEO. They were all written less than 3 weeks after the employees started their positions, and all of them in response to an influx of negative feedback about the new leadership. Each of these reviewers also felt the need to close out their reviews by attacking all the former employees who left because they were "spoiled", "didn't want to grow" or weren't down with a "progressive pace." 👍 Nothing fishy there at all.

13
avatar
PeopleKeep Response
6y
Hi! Thank you for your honest feedback. We're trying to improve our employee experience here at PeopleKeep. We'd love it if you'd take a moment to provide some tangible and actionable feedback for the leadership team. https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1vGCSXc28fkDVaDTVROMA0CpPFiDoyO7QBrU50xPEKvY/edit
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All