employer cover photo

Peer Health Exchange

Is this your company?

Great strategy and mission; brutal workload, unrealistically high standards, and not enough training or support - Anonymous employee Peer Health Exchange Employee Review

2.0
May 11, 2013
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Employees are high-performing, ambitious, and motivated. - Great mission and strategy for promoting health education among high school students. - Opportunity to have a lot of responsibility and manage people very early in one's career (e.g., just out of college).

Cons

- Poor work/life balance: 80-100 hour work weeks were considered normal and acceptable. - Not enough training for new employees (e.g., expected to lead meetings with PHE volunteers on day 2). - Understaffed: constantly scrambling to get everything done, despite working 16-hour days. - Upper management set unrealistically high standards that were out of touch with how the program actually works in the field. - Didn't invest in technologies or services that would enable employees to be more effective and efficient at their jobs (e.g., having to drive two hours to drop something off that could be mailed instead; inefficient, internal software that hadn't been updated in 10 years; near-constant IT problems). Note: This review is most likely out of date -- I imagine (hope!) that PHE has addressed these issues since I was employed there.

Explore other reviews about Peer Health Exchange

5.0
Jun 13, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Friendly co-workers who genuinely believe in the mission - Great compensation, benefits, etc. for the nonprofit industry - Work-life balance is heavily prioritized - Professional development strongly encouraged

Cons

- Not immune to industry conditions, layoffs - HR/Talent sometimes stretched thin, mixed messages

1
1.0
Jun 2, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

You get to work from home

Cons

The organization is plagued by constant restructuring, a high and growing turnover rate, and a leadership team that fosters a toxic and adversarial culture. Salary discussions are off the table, and terminations often seem influenced by personal bias rather than merit. I would not recommend this as a workplace now or in the near future. Once a reputable organization, it now prioritizes executive compensation over mission-driven work, operating more like a for-profit entity under the guise of a non-profit.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All