employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Pedestrian Group

Is this your company?

Ignore the awards and ask the staff. - Anonymous employee Pedestrian Group Employee Review

2.0
Oct 6, 2021
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Talented younger staff members with creative skills.

Cons

- Tyrant senior management style. Across all departments putting unnecessary pressure on staff for commercial (and their own commission) gain. (i.e. pushing unapproved content to go live in order to hit budgets, forcing teams to work into early hours of morning and approving sales that impacts the brand integrity, - Lack of growth opportunity across the board. - Low salary, well under industry standard. Management disregard salary discussion within yearly reviews - Bullying within senior management - especially commercial team. - No brand integrity. Accepting commercial briefs from organisations that directly go against what their audience stand for (Gambling & Australian Defence Force).

Explore other reviews about Pedestrian Group

4.0
May 28, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great Management, lots of opportunity

Cons

No Progression, long hours sometimes

1.0
Jan 22, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The team lower on the org chart are great people in a horrible workplace

Cons

The current structure reflects a concentration of senior leadership drawn largely from similar professional backgrounds, which has contributed to a leadership approach that feels disconnected from both the organisation’s audience and its internal teams. This has resulted in a top-heavy model that sits at odds with the needs of a youth-focused publisher. High workloads, limited support, and a lack of effective response to staff feedback have contributed to ongoing turnover. Accountability is perceived to sit unevenly across the business, with decision-making and responsibility often misaligned. Commercial teams operate with significant autonomy but limited oversight, and persistent underperformance against targets has not been clearly addressed, despite comparatively high levels of remuneration. This has created frustration and eroded trust across teams. Editorial functions remain constrained by legacy processes and formats, and the brand has struggled to evolve at the pace of the wider media landscape. As a result, it has not consistently adapted its voice, product offering, or strategy to meet the expectations of a rapidly changing audience.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All