Pros
Some talented and hardworking colleagues.
Cons
The contrast between reviews here is honestly difficult to ignore. Current and former employees will likely have very different perspectives depending on how closely aligned they were with leadership and whether they ever challenged systemic issues within the company.
In some departments, there appears to be a recurring pattern of long-tenured employees eventually exiting after a relatively short ceiling of tenure, while leadership within those teams remains largely unchanged. Over time, this has contributed to concerns around retention, continuity, and institutional knowledge.
The company values presented externally often do not match the lived employee experience internally.
Over the years, many thoughtful, high-performing employees have left or been pushed out, and recent layoffs appear to have accelerated that trend significantly. The resulting culture feels increasingly defined not by collaboration, accountability, or strong product thinking, but by loyalty dynamics and internal politics.
A few recurring themes that have been raised repeatedly:
- High-performing employees, particularly women, experiencing burnout and high turnover
- Concerns around a longstanding “boys club” culture
- Employees who raise valid concerns eventually being labeled “not a culture fit”
- Leadership appearing more focused on internal loyalty and competitive posturing than sustainable product growth
- A growing disconnect between leadership messaging and day-to-day operational reality
At this point, prospective employees should ask thoughtful questions about turnover, leadership accountability, and why so many experienced employees have exited under similar circumstances.
