Not a good place to work - Anonymous employee ParkMan Employee Review

1.0
Jan 1, 2019
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Remote work any day at any time with no previous notification. Nobody controls this and you don't have to log your hours.

Cons

Parkman is a very bad place to work. If you are looking for your first job, this is not a good place where to start. You will not learn anything good, only bad habits. If you are looking for a new job, you do not deserve a place like this. You can do better anywhere else. These are the reasons: Founders lack of professional experience, this is their first job. They are amateurs, they don’t know how a software company works, what practices are needed and how things work in the industry. Their manage the company as if it is a university project. The good reviews in glassdoor have been written by the founders and by request from them to a few employees. They don’t take the feedback as an input to work with, they believe it is just angry people who are against them. The CEO has zero knowledge of programming, designing or technology background, but he claims to actively participate in those activities and pressures the employees hurrying them up. Bad management. Founders believe knowledge comes with the name of the role they adopted, but they have no experience, no training nor interest in develop their management skills. Lack of a clear strategy: the goals are based in what airbnb and uber reached, but not in a historical information, market study or real projection studies. They really think that because uber did it, they will too. Lack of contingency plans: CEO said that he doesn’t believe in plans B, so he risks the company and its employers, basically he gambles with the company because in the worst scenario, he sells and he makes a good number out of it meanwhile the rest of the people will lose their job. CEO has the majority of the shares, it is his way or nothing, he’s a very closed mind person who believes he’s the new version of Steve Jobs. He cannot see outside the box. The company has the aim of being based in junior positions because junior people do not contradict, it is also the first job for most of the people. It is a bad first job because of the lack of good practices and professionalism. In the last 3 months, 1/3 of the company employees have been fired. Most of them were senior people that have been working here for 2 to 4 years. People with 2 years of experience are named senior as a way of keeping them in the company but not because they have senior skills. No metrics and as the founders don’t know anything about software development, they don’t know how long it takes to implement a feature. This means that most of the people say “one week” when they can implement everything in 2 days. Women are treated as dumb and they make remarkable differences in between genders. Lack of a good working and professional environment and zero trainings policy. The company does not offer constant training in important matters such as methodologies, programming, management, soft skills, etc. The managers do not care about their own training, so they don’t care about others neither. Lack of communication, listening to others and acceptance of mistakes. Managers blame others instead of taking responsibility. They do not iterate through issues or revise where the problems come from to avoid repeating situations. They blame investors, employees and external sources for their mistakes and they say that out loud, showing that they are not good in what they do. Lack of security and testing in their products. Their software quality is bad. Demands can come anytime due to serious security issues within the apps. No UX/UI designer has lasted more than 6 months or survived the trial period. The CEO believes he’s a UX designer and other people’s ideas are not taken. You must follow what he says instead of being creative as you should be in this role. Experienced developers leave the company after just a few months of working because they see how amateur the environment is. They have the zero investment in marketing strategy, which will lead to nothing as people do not know about the existence of the app or company without any marketing. Zero career opportunities. Zero company projections. There is huge fat cash bonus if they hire somebody you recommend and that person passes the trial period, but nobody recommends anyone since this is a terrible place to work. I think this says everything.

avatar
ParkMan Response
7y
Thank you for your valuable feedback. I am sad to hear you thought ParkMan was a terrible place, and I have read through your feedback and would like to share my thoughts on some of the feedback. Regarding the Founders: It would be crazy to assume that founders are all knowing gods. We are people just like you, and our experience is limited, which is why we want to recruit people who can help us and bring this company to the next level. Luckily, we have managed to recruit some top talent to the company with much more experience than ourselves. Regarding the reviews: I am not a big fan of conspiracy theories, but rather based my decisions on facts. Fact is that there are quire a lot of negative comments here, but also some positive. We are working on improvements and the goal is to have a happy, productive team. Bad Management: I recommend the book “Extreme ownership” by Jocko Willink, and “High output management” by Andrew Grove. Lack of clear strategy: I am sorry to hear that you did not understand our strategy. That is my fault. As CEO it is my job to communicate the strategy clearly to everyone. Lack of contingency plans: Sometimes, companies need to let a few people go in order to guarantee that the team can WIN. Sorry that you were the one we had to let go. Due to a strategy change decided unanimously by the board of directors, some great people had to be let go. Just because you get a job, does not mean you will have it forever. The world changes. I am sorry for that. The rest of your feedback I also find valuable, and we will consider your feedback as we develop our practices.

Explore other reviews about ParkMan

5.0
Apr 3, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

One of the best parts of ParkMan is the culture. People are smart, friendly, and excited about the job they are performing. Work-life balance is great, management is generally supportive and understanding. I worked remotely but still felt as an important part of the team and was involved in the daily updates, slack conversations, etc. My manager trusted me and gave me freedom to move on my own, I did not feel micromanaged (and I liked that!).

Cons

Not having an office or a team at my work place was difficult at times, especially because of some benefits that I couldn't access like insurance or 401k.

5.0
May 5, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Team spirit is on a very high level as well as the working environment. ParkMan genuinely cares about employee well-being and hosts frequent team-building events, virtual and in-person, that help foster connection across departments. The culture is ambitious — teams are passionate, motivated, and always pushing to innovate and improve. At the same time, leadership clearly values people as more than just their output.

Cons

Sometimes there are too many opportunities to get involved — which can feel overwhelming if you don’t set boundaries. It’s great that leadership encourages growth and cross-functional collaboration, but it’s important to prioritize

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All