Poor leadership, Asylum Research - Anonymous employee Oxford Instruments Employee Review

1.0
Oct 6, 2016
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Team of capable, smart, honest, hard-working professionals Interesting, trans disciplinary technology Opportunities to interact with leading industrial and academic groups around the globe

Cons

Principals do not understand the value of others, hire valuable experience they will not listen to, do not find value on hiring and using effectively business talents outside their skill set -many blind spots there Company and team opportunities are fumbled by not planning and placing resources based on data and facts Cult mindset product development on obscure unproven new techniques that hurts marketing and sales teams, stop marketing penetration Decisions fall in the hands of very few with no rational or due process / group analysis. On acquisition employees got admonished not to communicate with OI which limited visibility of areas for improvement No career development, chip-on-shoulder attitude by principal -no leadership skills: take full credit for team wins, blame full failure on others Below industry compensation Emergence of important number of competitors and dominance by market leader with savvier business teams

Explore other reviews about Oxford Instruments

5.0
May 19, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Management values workers hard work and will give promotion to those that deserve to be promoted.

Cons

No cons No comments Some politics Some managers not so good Good workers are let go without real cause.

2.0
Feb 21, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Company outlook is good, job security for those who don't break. A handful of great senior guys who will help when they're not overloaded themselves. Starting pay is above average, yearly performance-based raises. For those that can last a few years, the variety of experiences look great on your next resume.

Cons

Advertised as 85% travel but really pressured for 100% with no proactive regard for employee welfare, must demand breaks to get them with significant pushback. As the company boasts banner years, they cut employee per diem and other travel benefits to further maximize profits. Hemorrhaging senior talent. Increased "attaboys" and non-monetary verbal recognition as compensation. Inner circle of employees cultivated by senior management as Yes-men to give vocal support to unpopular decisions. Employee feedback response is "that's coming from corporate, we're just implementing the policy. " Growth is time-gated while hiring engineers with 20+ years experience. Little to no support, procedures or documentation for the product line an FSE is expected to maintain--learn by banging your head against the wall.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All