Good Mission, Poor Management - Anonymous employee Oceana Employee Review

2.0
Jul 13, 2015
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Oceana’s overall mission has evolved to improving fisheries in major fishing nations with the ultimate goal of strengthening food security, an exceptional cause. The work can be engaging and dynamic. It can be great learning experience for someone with little to no conservation experience who wants to get their feet wet.

Cons

Firstly, there is little room for advancement for early career individuals. The organization is top heavy, few positions in the middle, and numerous early-career folk. As many have commented before, leadership is poor and the very few early career people who are able to move up and receive a competitive salary are typically friends with their boss. Secondly, Oceana Headquarters DC is not the place for anyone who earned a doctorate. Someone with lower credentials, less work experience, but a friend of the boss will secure a better position than you. Unlike the other Oceana offices that place a higher value on science, the DC office will only hire a PhD when campaign/program wants to appear credible. Finally, salaries are not competitive with the market and there is a huge variance in salary for the same position within the organization.

Explore other reviews about Oceana

5.0
Feb 19, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great people and meaningful work.

Cons

Its a mid-size org so advancement opportunities are not always there/ can take a long time to achieve.

2.0
Jun 18, 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- The mission and its relevance to local communities around the world. - Great legal and grassroots teams that are hardworking and dedicated to the mission.

Cons

- Organization acomplishes very little toward its mission objectives, and lacks a cohesive vision across international offices. - In my 25 year career, this was the worst organizational culture I've ever experienced. Never have I been treated so poorly as an employee. - Leadership, in particular the CEO, were constantly dishonest, having teams work against each other, and contantly playing games rather than promoting a collaborative, authentic, and genuine decision making process. - Pay inequality is clear, and little to no transparency over many of leadership's decisions, both policy and administrative. - Many 'legacy' staff are protected and have been promoted far beyond the capablities and the organization refuses to do what needs to be done, and keeps the orginal team members on the rolls because they are friends.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All