Nubank is really a good place to work? - Customer Excellence Supervisor Nubank Employee Review

3.0
Feb 16, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

As benefits I can mention the salary, always paid on time, the coworkers that are usually very helpful and helpful and the fact that I work at home office.

Cons

The company has lost its culture, no longer being a motivating company and a healthy environment to work in. All employees are required to do jobs from step above, having to absorb demands that would not be theirs, causing many burnout leaves and other psychological problems. The leadership and squads don't follow a pattern, so depending on the squad your performance will be considered good or bad, depending solely and exclusively on your direct leader. The company no longer sees employees as people, but as totally disposable numbers. Good professionals who are not performing well because they are overloaded are dismissed, while bad professionals, who do practically nothing all day, remain in the company. The company preaches a false inclusion, especially of brown and black people, hiring only to fill quotas and not engaging in a real development of such professionals. About 30/35 hours of meetings every week to deal with the same issues, forcing leaders to stay after hours to minimally deliver their demands.

Explore other reviews about Nubank

5.0
Apr 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Lots of exciting bets being made, many growth opportunities, very smart people who also know how to have work life balance

Cons

Priorities shift a lot which can be frustrating, but that's part of the game of fintech (very fast moving)

avatar
Nubank Response
2mo
Hello, we hope you're doing well! We’re happy about your journey — after all, it’s still Day 1. Thank you for sharing your experience with us. Your feedback is essential as we continue to challenge the status quo of our processes. The Future is Purple! 💜
2.0
Jun 15, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I joined Nubank seeking international experience, adventure, and the opportunity to work across cultures — and in those respects the role delivered. The quarterly travel to São Paulo was genuinely exciting and broadened my perspective. That said, there are important practical realities that US-based engineers should understand before accepting an offer. * Decent equity package and signing bonus upon joining, though base salary was below market rate for the level and experience expected * Interesting mission — bringing a successful Brazilian fintech model to the US market is genuinely exciting * Good benefits including health coverage and mental health support * Exposure to an international work environment — I improved my Portuguese significantly and gained meaningful cross-cultural experience * The interview process is notably easier than most US tech companies I have interviewed at — not just FAANG. Expect a simple coding task and a basic system design question. If you are used to rigorous US hiring bars, you will find this process surprisingly light.

Cons

* If you are a US-based engineer joining from a company like Amazon, Google, or similar, be aware that you may be embedded with a fully Brazilian offshore team rather than a US-based one. The cultural, organizational, and communication differences are significant and the ramp-up is considerably steeper than a typical US tech role. It is also worth considering that compensation structures differ significantly between US-based and Brazil-based employees. If you are a US hire embedded with a Brazilian team, be aware that this pay disparity — which is common in such arrangements — can create subtle but real friction in team dynamics. My strong advice to anyone receiving an offer: ask explicitly which team you will be joining and push for a US-based team if possible — it will make a meaningful difference in your experience and success. * While English is the official company language, the practical English fluency of many team members was significantly well below the B2 level needed for effective day-to-day collaboration. For US-based engineers who do not speak Portuguese, this will create significant communication friction and should be a serious consideration before accepting an offer. I spoke Portuguese at a C1 level — evaluated by the company itself — and even then the language dynamic added complexity to an already steep ramp-up. * The performance review process felt more personal than professional at times. Feedback occasionally targeted the individual rather than the work, and some observations felt more like character assessments than constructive guidance tied to specific outcomes. For a company that prides itself on innovation and people-first culture, the review process could benefit from more structured, objective, and actionable feedback standards. * The onboarding could be better structured for US hires joining Brazilian teams — there is a learning curve that goes beyond just the technology

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All