Top down, but in sheep-clothing - Consultant Netlight Employee Review

1.0
Sep 7, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Netlight is really great if you want to find good people to start another company with. It's good for networking and getting to know people in a new city and salaries are decent. You get to go on a trip with the company twice a year, which is fun.

Cons

The biggest lie at Netlight is that it is a flat organization with no bosses. There are bosses everywhere, and even dedicated colleagues to monitor you. They call them "mentors" or "managers". Forget about personal development, there will be no summits, no courses, I wasn't even allowed to buy a book for personal development. You get to read what they tell you to. That's the sect part of it. What's important about these reviews is that the people who have been in it, seen the problems and gotten out - write the truth here. I am positive that Netlight themselves are still sending glassdoor links to new employees to make sure that they write awesome stuff here, and universum-survey links and what not. Complete brainwash. If there are no bosses, why is everything being decided behind closed doors?

Explore other reviews about Netlight

4.0
Feb 21, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Very skilled engineering team! A pleasure building stuff with them!

Cons

Got moved around from project to project without too much input

3
1.0
Oct 3, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Some colleagues are genuinely kind.

Cons

•The promise of “choosing your projects” is misleading. In reality, sales staff assign projects to friends or favorites, often disregarding merit or technical skill. •Junior salespeople with little to no technical background have disproportionate control over consultant assignments and are involved in defining “competence.” •Career progression depends more on appearance, compliance, and how well you flatter managers than on actual expertise. •Very low seniority in the Copenhagen office — most experienced people either leave for clients or quit. Those who stay often failed to advance elsewhere. •Culture of self-doubt: employees are frequently told not to feel “too confident,” creating a manipulative atmosphere that undermines trust in one’s own abilities. •Heavy emphasis on performative presentations and “selling yourself” over real project delivery. •Sales and recruiting staff, along with a small circle of senior consultants, control onboarding and project allocation. This leads to newcomers feeling isolated, underutilized, and in some cases demoralized. •Consultants are pitted against colleagues in other countries, where projects are often awarded based on lower cost rather than skill or fit. •Mentorship is superficial — focused on numbers and clout for mentors rather than meaningful development. •Very high control environment: management centralizes all decisions and fosters dependency through constant questioning of employees’ competence. •Frequent sick leave, including among management, which reflects the strain of the company’s practices. Clients often recognize and value consultants’ contributions more than the firm itself. For example, I was offered ~20% higher salary by a client compared to what I was earning through the consultancy. This highlights how much the company profits from consultants while underinvesting in them.

9
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All