Worst CEO Ever - "Nilesh Iyer" - Vice President Natixis Employee Review

1.0
Dec 3, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good Team & Onsite Management

Cons

The number one issue in Natixis India is its CEO Nilesh Iyer , he is rude , bossy , arrogant and Naive. It seems sometimes he is running a school. He has opinions about everything and just like to babble in english. He cant handle simple questions coming from anyone and literally start making rude faces infront of everyone insulting and intimidating the questioner justifying his arrogant behavior. He has no respect to his colleagues and time and again boasts his designation to everyone. Not to mention everytime he rudely speaks ignites hatred and animosity towards him . Some of employees have already left the company pointing him the reason. Even the people of his circle have started following his lead and started behaving arrogantly towards their subordinates inculcating the culture of red carpet for the “alpha group”

Explore other reviews about Natixis

5.0
Jun 24, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Nice people Work life balance

Cons

None everything is great !

1.0
May 11, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

A lot of easy transportation options.

Cons

I'll be direct: Natixis CIB's management has a serious disconnect from market reality, and a recent job posting ("IT compliance and finance manager") is a perfect example of it. They are advertising an L1 IT management role — a squad lead position — with a requirement list that would challenge a senior director at a top-tier bank. Python, SQL, Informatica, Business Objects, Power BI, Easymorph, Sybase, CI/CD, Agile, data modeling, requirements gathering, budget management, Steerco presentations, compliance oversight, and direct people management — all in one role, all expected simultaneously. The compensation attached to this does not come close to reflecting that scope. Not even close. This isn't an isolated posting. It reflects how Natixis routinely structures roles: overload the job description, underpay the hire, and then use performance management as a pressure valve when the person — predictably — can't do everything. I have personally seen talented, experienced managers placed into roles like this and then PIPs'd out when they couldn't deliver the impossible. The PIP process here is not a development tool. It is an exit mechanism dressed up in HR language. Leadership operates in a top-down, Paris-driven model that is slow to change and resistant to accountability. Decisions that should take days take months. Technology choices lag the industry by years — the tools listed in this posting (Informatica, Business Objects, Easymorph) tell you everything you need to know about the modernization roadmap. If you are a strong IT manager with real skills and real options, do not take this role at the pay they are offering. You will be stretched thin, undervalued, and held accountable for systemic failures that predate you. The market will pay you significantly more for less frustration.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All