Boss was abusive, overworked, and treated like glorified secretary - Postbaccalaureate IRTA NIH Employee Review

1.0
Jan 20, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I guess the name brand

Cons

They treated me worse than a technician since I was basically a glorified secretary. They got mad at me unless I worked 14-16 hours a day for less than 30k a year after graduating from an ivy league school even though none of the postdocs worked more than 6 hours a day. All I did was schedule patient meetings and they said if I wanted any learning opportunities I had to get them on my own time which they didn't even leave me time for and everything that went wrong regardless of whether it was my fault, such as patients not showing up to appointments, was blamed on me. They didn't even allow me to go to poster sessions that every other IRTA went to, since I hadn't finished scheduling enough patients which was impossible since half of them would by default not show up anyways. Half the IRTAs in my lab rage quit before their time was up. I wish I had done the same long ago as I got nothing out of it as all I did was scheduling and I got no posters abstracts or publication. I finally rage quit after my boss sent me an angry email for not coming in and working/ managing schedules on Christmas eve, which was announced to be a holiday for every other NIH employee, while my boss himself took 2 weeks off.

Explore other reviews about NIH

5.0
Jun 26, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Not stressful, science based, not profit.

Cons

Slow processes, too many meetings.

4.0
Jun 25, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Working with the some of the smartest scientists and clinicians in the world. So many learning opportunities. Kind patients. Allowed time to care for patients as there is no pressure of quotas by health insurance.

Cons

Nursing management can be verbally abusive with frequent retaliation and intimidation. As most older nurses have worked there for most of their career, they are dismissive of new perspectives and resistant to evidence-based practice.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All