Not a Place for Someone to Thrive - Manager Moss Adams LLP Employee Review

1.0
Sep 12, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The company offers attractive benefits and maintains a good work-life balance.

Cons

Training and Onboarding: There is a noticeable lack of formal training and resources for new hires, which impacts the onboarding process and initial performance. Career Development: There is insufficient focus on career development from the Partners. Many Partners also lack the experience necessary to effectively manage and mentor employees. Review System: The existing review system tends to be overly negative and does not facilitate constructive feedback or professional growth. It often comes across as condescending rather than supportive. Technological Infrastructure: The current technology is outdated, and there is limited investment from the Partners in upgrading or improving systems for greater efficiency. Compensation Structure: The existing compensation structure does not provide adequate incentives for employees to strive for higher performance. This lack of motivation may result in decreased productivity and engagement. Many employees are leaving for all of the above reasons.

Explore other reviews about Moss Adams LLP

5.0
Jun 1, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great office and great folks to work with.

Cons

Lower pay than industry standard

2.0
Jan 6, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

About the only pros I see from this company was remote work and benefits. You did have some good employees.

Cons

The organization struggles with significant management and cultural issues despite stated diversity commitments. While diversity initiatives exist, they have inadvertently created siloed groups that prioritize in-group interests over collaborative team culture. Reports to HR and anonymous reporting channels regarding discrimination and workplace concerns often went unaddressed, undermining trust in leadership. Substantial disparities exist in how different teams are treated. International team members, particularly those in India, face excessive workload expectations—regularly working 12+ hour days, extending until midnight or 1 AM US time. This creates an unsustainable and inequitable work environment. Leadership has not been transparent about offshoring strategies. While the company denied plans to move work overseas, Indian team members received extensive training while US-based employees did not, suggesting contradictory long-term planning. Recent layoffs have raised questions about decision-making criteria, with highly skilled contributors, and just good people over all being let go while some underperformers and rude, bad leaders were retained, potentially due to favoritism within management cliques. The company's stated values around diversity and inclusion are not reflected in day-to-day operations or management decisions. Significant improvement is needed in leadership accountability, equitable treatment across all locations, and transparent communication about business strategy.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All