Review of Research Position at Rahway, NJ Site - Staff Chemist Merck Employee Review

3.0
Apr 18, 2010
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Extremely innovative company that was one of the most respected in the industry. Until recently, most of the science was performed in-house, with top-notch scientists. Several first-in-class compounds put Merck ahead of its competitors in the late 90s/early 2000s.

Cons

Was a great place to work prior to merger with Schering-Plough. Now scientists spend more time worrying about their jobs than accomplishing tasks in the laboratory. Management is only interested in meeting numbers. A freeze has been placed on all promotions and new-hires for the last 18 months, resulting in higher workloads and low moral.

Explore other reviews about Merck

5.0
Jun 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Amazing to work and smart people to work around.

Cons

Not sponsoring in the US

4.0
Jun 2, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Over my tenure, I had the opportunity to work alongside highly talented and mission-driven colleagues dedicated to improving patient outcomes. The organization provided exposure to cross-functional collaboration, leadership development opportunities, and meaningful work supporting healthcare providers, patients, and community stakeholders. I appreciated the company's commitment to innovation, professional growth, and serving patients through scientific advancement.

Cons

Like many large organizations, priorities and organizational structures evolved over time, which occasionally created uncertainty and changes in responsibilities. Decision-making processes could sometimes be complex due to the size of the organization, and navigating multiple layers of stakeholders occasionally impacted speed and execution.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All