Forensic Peer Support - Peer Support Specialist Merakey Employee Review

2.0
Mar 12, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Being able to serve my community working for a human services agency. Very challenging part time job. Sometimes rewarding - being the local county human services officials wanted a forensic treatment team. As a community we tried to help my peers involved in both the behavorial health and criminal justices systems.

Cons

No room for full time work. Local supervisor was anal at micro managing all her departments. I deal with PTSD and while this agency states being trauma informed - they're aren't at all for it's employees. It got old fast hearing "maybe you're in the wrong profession." That was management's way of being trauma informed with me. Internal corporate culture is a joke. Always had to come into work on a day off for internal corporate trainings. Which were a waste of time...

Explore other reviews about Merakey

5.0
Apr 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great Company and I love individuals we serve

Cons

More exposure in job fairs and hiring events. getting our company name out there with more social media advertising

1.0
Dec 16, 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The mission of the organization is meaningful, and hiring managers genuinely value quality candidates and strong placements. The work can be rewarding when the focus is on making thoughtful hires that truly support vulnerable individuals. Team members care deeply about doing the right thing and producing strong, long-term results.

Cons

Under new management, recruiting has shifted to a numbers-driven model where metrics far outweigh quality, outcomes, and human impact. Recruiters are now responsible for interviewing and decision-making while simultaneously being held to significantly higher, rigid goals that do not account for location based candidate flow or program differences. Time is spent submitting phone screens and documenting nonviable candidates purely to satisfy metrics instead of actively sourcing strong applicants. Being discouraged from cherry-picking candidates, despite hiring for roles supporting vulnerable populations is concerning and demoralizing. This approach reduces efficiency, negatively impacts candidate experience, and has contributed to burnout and low morale. The system feels misaligned with the mission and set up for failure.

4
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All