Their mission statement is just for show - Anonymous employee Merakey Employee Review

1.0
Jan 8, 2013
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The chance to get to help individuals who have no one to help them or provide the support needed is about the only positive thing i can say about the company.

Cons

Management is terrible. The company itself ( the people higher up than team associates) are very unprofessional. The company seems to portray as if they care about these individuals living within their company homes, yet they do nothing to ensure that their clients receive the best service possible as well as their complete necessities. They are manipulative, rude, careless, and inconsiderate to employees not on management level. I definitely would not recommend anyone to apply for the company or for anyone to put their loved ones in their homes. Anybody that is not already in management does not have the opportunity to be promoted and nobody gets a pay raise. Whether you are working for the company for a year or ten years you stay at $9.00/ hour.

Explore other reviews about Merakey

5.0
Apr 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great Company and I love individuals we serve

Cons

More exposure in job fairs and hiring events. getting our company name out there with more social media advertising

1.0
Dec 16, 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The mission of the organization is meaningful, and hiring managers genuinely value quality candidates and strong placements. The work can be rewarding when the focus is on making thoughtful hires that truly support vulnerable individuals. Team members care deeply about doing the right thing and producing strong, long-term results.

Cons

Under new management, recruiting has shifted to a numbers-driven model where metrics far outweigh quality, outcomes, and human impact. Recruiters are now responsible for interviewing and decision-making while simultaneously being held to significantly higher, rigid goals that do not account for location based candidate flow or program differences. Time is spent submitting phone screens and documenting nonviable candidates purely to satisfy metrics instead of actively sourcing strong applicants. Being discouraged from cherry-picking candidates, despite hiring for roles supporting vulnerable populations is concerning and demoralizing. This approach reduces efficiency, negatively impacts candidate experience, and has contributed to burnout and low morale. The system feels misaligned with the mission and set up for failure.

4
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All