employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

McAlpine Hussmann

Is this your company?

This place will wear down your mental health - Assistant Manager McAlpine Hussmann Employee Review

1.0
Dec 15, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Hybrid for some people and only if form is signed by manager + HR + GM

Cons

The leadership team is poor. When a colleague passed away, they couldn't even commit to celebrating his life when colleagues needed to come together most. Everything revolves around the technicians, while Office Managers and Service Coordinators are treated poorly. If someone brings concerns about bullying or bad behavior to HR, both HR and the Branch Manager turn a blind eye. In this company, those who don't follow processes stay for years, while skilled professionals leave because they know they deserve better. If you think cliques only exist in high school, think again—leadership here behaves the same way. If you're part of the "club," you get perks and special treatment. If you're not, you'll quickly see how they treat you. Though this is a Panasonic company, complaints to Panasonic leadership go unanswered. The company's three core values are everywhere on the walls all over the building, but are just for show.

Explore other reviews about McAlpine Hussmann

4.0
Jun 29, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Overall good. Team is caring.

Cons

Not too much career progression as an AP.

2.0
Apr 13, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Diversity of work in numerous areas allowing for on job training. A good place to learn a broad set of skills to take to another employer who will treat and respect you better.

Cons

Training was conducted with a sink-or-swim mentality. There was minimal formal training for the sector, apart from basic health and safety liability-avoidance exercises (e.g., how to use a ladder), usually delivered in meetings. Excessive paperwork was common, often for the sake of box-ticking rather than adding value. There was a consistently poor work-life balance. Staff were expected to always be contactable, with the service industry role being used as justification to promote a “work comes first” mentality. Bait-and-switch tactics were used during the employment process. The company experienced very high staff turnover across the board — a clear indicator of deeper systemic issues that remain unaddressed. Poorly behaving clients were consistently prioritised over staff wellbeing, Placing employees in reactive roles where they were forced to act like firefighters, constantly putting out figurative fires.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All