No, not a positive experience - Anonymous employee Mastercard Employee Review

1.0
Jul 25, 2015
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Interesting projects and innovation going on in some groups

Cons

Wow so disappointing and so far from my expectation. With 15 years of success in payments industry I don't think I ever felt as u devalued and under utilized as I did during my time at MC. The whole experience was so odd. I've worked for startups and huge co's but the leadership here was really bad (some) with lots of people with very little experience outside of MC, which is so unfortunate be because they don't appreciate varied talents and backgrounds. I noticed high turnover and lots of colleagues looking for other jobs and would notice no one was real, they all spoke like stepford wives about the company like they were worried someone was listening. Just so odd and so not a place I would recommend unless you really get an awesome group and boss, which there were some I encountered

Explore other reviews about Mastercard

5.0
Jun 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Technically strong and work culture is good

Cons

interview process is long , no issues

4.0
May 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Mastercard does a great job fostering an inclusive and supportive environment. There are genuinely good people throughout the organization, and leadership often invests in employee engagement through events, recognition, and culture-building initiatives. I enjoyed many of the relationships I built while working there, and there are teams that truly care about collaboration and supporting one another.

Cons

Compensation at the director level did not feel competitive compared to the level of responsibility expected. Career advancement can also be extremely challenging due to how top-heavy the organization is with senior leadership roles. There are a large number of Senior Vice Presidents, sometimes without clear scope or experience aligned to the title, which creates limited room for high-performing employees to grow. At times, it felt like senior leaders were being hired primarily to manage or communicate with other senior leaders, rather than drive meaningful operational impact. In product and go-to-market roles especially, priorities are often heavily driven by funding decisions. It can be frustrating when projects suddenly shift in importance or remain underfunded for long periods of time while awaiting senior leadership review. This sometimes leaves highly talented employees in limbo, unable to move initiatives forward despite strong momentum or market opportunity. The organization can also be very comfortable with the status quo, which creates a slower pace that many employees seem accustomed to. For people who are highly motivated and eager to drive change, it can feel difficult to navigate the number of roadblocks and layers of approval required to move initiatives forward.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All