Alert: Bogus job postings and damage control - Senior Business Leader Mastercard Employee Review

1.0
Feb 27, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Brand name company and well recognized. Staff are very good. Salary and benefits good.....however.....

Cons

Mastercard must be worried. This video they made (above) is clearly trying to control the bad press about all their recent firings. There are many people finally speaking out about their age discrimination firings in the US and abroad. They are posting bogus jobs at locations (like Belgium) to give the impression that the office is still relevant when everyone internally knows all the jobs are going (or gone) to London and regions and the office is being closed in a few years. I know for a fact that internal HR people create bogus postings about how great the company is, on sites like Glassdoor to counteract the negative ones. HR and reviews are used as managers to get back at employees or get rid of employees. It is a great set up.

Explore other reviews about Mastercard

5.0
Jun 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Technically strong and work culture is good

Cons

interview process is long , no issues

4.0
May 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Mastercard does a great job fostering an inclusive and supportive environment. There are genuinely good people throughout the organization, and leadership often invests in employee engagement through events, recognition, and culture-building initiatives. I enjoyed many of the relationships I built while working there, and there are teams that truly care about collaboration and supporting one another.

Cons

Compensation at the director level did not feel competitive compared to the level of responsibility expected. Career advancement can also be extremely challenging due to how top-heavy the organization is with senior leadership roles. There are a large number of Senior Vice Presidents, sometimes without clear scope or experience aligned to the title, which creates limited room for high-performing employees to grow. At times, it felt like senior leaders were being hired primarily to manage or communicate with other senior leaders, rather than drive meaningful operational impact. In product and go-to-market roles especially, priorities are often heavily driven by funding decisions. It can be frustrating when projects suddenly shift in importance or remain underfunded for long periods of time while awaiting senior leadership review. This sometimes leaves highly talented employees in limbo, unable to move initiatives forward despite strong momentum or market opportunity. The organization can also be very comfortable with the status quo, which creates a slower pace that many employees seem accustomed to. For people who are highly motivated and eager to drive change, it can feel difficult to navigate the number of roadblocks and layers of approval required to move initiatives forward.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All