Successful in spite of poor leadership - Senior Vice President Mastercard Employee Review

2.0
Aug 24, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- generous bonus and stock options (for senior managers) - a global and stable technology network - interacting with colleagues from all over the world; very few companies are global in the way Mastercard is global

Cons

- there are as many cultures as there are managers; the company culture is weak or non-existent - virtually all the acquisitions made in the past 7 years have flopped - senior leadership does not hold itself accountable (e.g. for failed acquisitions) - pays a lot of lip-service to (management cannot stop talking about) doing good but has invested very little in that area in reality - to get promoted and do well in the company, you need to schmooze, be from a certain South Asian country and/or have godfathers. It operates like a country club.

Explore other reviews about Mastercard

5.0
Jun 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Technically strong and work culture is good

Cons

interview process is long , no issues

4.0
May 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Mastercard does a great job fostering an inclusive and supportive environment. There are genuinely good people throughout the organization, and leadership often invests in employee engagement through events, recognition, and culture-building initiatives. I enjoyed many of the relationships I built while working there, and there are teams that truly care about collaboration and supporting one another.

Cons

Compensation at the director level did not feel competitive compared to the level of responsibility expected. Career advancement can also be extremely challenging due to how top-heavy the organization is with senior leadership roles. There are a large number of Senior Vice Presidents, sometimes without clear scope or experience aligned to the title, which creates limited room for high-performing employees to grow. At times, it felt like senior leaders were being hired primarily to manage or communicate with other senior leaders, rather than drive meaningful operational impact. In product and go-to-market roles especially, priorities are often heavily driven by funding decisions. It can be frustrating when projects suddenly shift in importance or remain underfunded for long periods of time while awaiting senior leadership review. This sometimes leaves highly talented employees in limbo, unable to move initiatives forward despite strong momentum or market opportunity. The organization can also be very comfortable with the status quo, which creates a slower pace that many employees seem accustomed to. For people who are highly motivated and eager to drive change, it can feel difficult to navigate the number of roadblocks and layers of approval required to move initiatives forward.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All