Worst Experience Ever - Senior Business Analyst MSRCosmos Employee Review

1.0
Jul 26, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I had the worst experience with MSR Cosmos.

Cons

I recently joined MSR Cosmos. After rounds of interviews i was placed on a project in T-Mobile as a contractor so i gave notice on my previous position to join this one. Their is a huge communication gap in this company. Two of us joined as a BA and QA that same day and both of us was not the right fit for that job. The actual job requirements did not matched at all with what was shared with me. Such a big disappointment working for them as even after figuring out their mistake, they did not do anything to ratify it.

Explore other reviews about MSRCosmos

5.0
Jan 4, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

great place to work at, should work here

Cons

nothing as such. very good place

1.0
May 24, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Very limited. They lack structure, support, and leadership, and HR is awful, with countless errors throughout the process. It is an international family business based in India.

Cons

The role was materially misrepresented during the interview process. What was positioned as a growth-focused opportunity turned out to be a collection of neglected or stagnant accounts with no clear strategy, limited engagement, and unrealistic expectations for turnaround without resources. Onboarding was chaotic and set the tone immediately. There was no structured ramp, frequent administrative errors, and ongoing confusion around compensation, tools, and internal processes. Unfortunately, these issues continued through offboarding, including inaccuracies in basic HR handling such as accrued vacation. Leadership was one of the most concerning aspects. There was a noticeable lack of competency in both sales execution and technology understanding, combined with inconsistent direction and minimal accountability. Rather than providing clarity or support, management often introduced more ambiguity, making it difficult to execute effectively or build momentum. The delivery and operating model felt fragmented. Heavy reliance on offshore resources without strong coordination led to disconnects in ownership, communication gaps, and challenges in delivering a cohesive client experience. After roughly six months, the role was eliminated under the explanation of “restructuring.” Given how the role was initially positioned, this raised serious concerns about transparency and planning at the leadership level. Overall, the experience reflected deeper systemic issues rather than isolated challenges.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All