employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

MIT Lincoln Laboratory

Part of MIT

Engaged employer

Technical Staff - Technical Staff MIT Lincoln Laboratory Employee Review

4.0
Jul 11, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Excellent research opportunities, interesting technology.

Cons

Projects are subject to government finance, so sometimes interesting projects can be shelved due to funding issues.

avatar
MIT Lincoln Laboratory Response
10y
IT is good that you have found excellent research opportunities. As we are frequently involved in early stage research, it is sometimes the case that our projects are deferred for funding or other reasons. We work closely with our sponsors to keep our project portfolio current with their needs, immediate and anticipated. In addition, we maintain an active internal research program to help us be a resource to sponsors.

Explore other reviews about MIT Lincoln Laboratory

5.0
Jun 3, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

It can vary a lot from group to group, but in general, wonderful place with wonderful people and lots of interesting work going on. Excellent benefits and lots of flexibility to explore different projects.

Cons

Little opportunity for advancement in terms of rank and compensation once you reach technical staff. Additionally (again varies from group to group) expectations of what a staff member does can be unclear and there can be a light sink-or-swim nature to the work, again depending on the group you're in.

4.0
Jun 17, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Worked with some of the smartest people I’ve ever known. Great opportunities to learn from your coworkers and an atmosphere that encourages learning, including a well-run technical education program. Fabulous support staff and technicians that can get seemingly impossible things done quickly. Great resources and lab spaces (if a bit dated). The nature of the work encourages good work/life balance. Fantastic benefits (though the pay is low).

Cons

No/limited opportunities for advancement makes this a hard place to work mid-career. Good engineers are promoted to be mediocre managers. Every program is under-funded, under-staffed, and over schedule. Bad managers are shuffled around but rarely fired.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All