Good place to work - Anonymous employee MIT Lincoln Laboratory Employee Review
4.0
Sep 11, 2017
Anonymous employee
Current employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook
Pros
Interesting work, nice mix of research and application, opportunities to publish and develop prototypes. Reasonable work/life balance and decent benefits.
Cons
Salaries are not competitive with industry and raise structure does not provide monetary incentives for performance. Need to be have two incomes to comfortably support a family.
MIT Lincoln Laboratory Response
8y
Thank you for taking the time to review the Lab. Retention of top staff is always a concern. Statistically we do well but there are often individuals who we hate to lose. We actively review our salary structure and look for areas where more attention is needed. Many of our staff find that the work-life balance and exceptional resources overshadow salary difference. Nonetheless, we continually work to improve.
Explore other reviews about MIT Lincoln Laboratory
It can vary a lot from group to group, but in general, wonderful place with wonderful people and lots of interesting work going on. Excellent benefits and lots of flexibility to explore different projects.
Cons
Little opportunity for advancement in terms of rank and compensation once you reach technical staff. Additionally (again varies from group to group) expectations of what a staff member does can be unclear and there can be a light sink-or-swim nature to the work, again depending on the group you're in.
Worked with some of the smartest people I’ve ever known.
Great opportunities to learn from your coworkers and an atmosphere that encourages learning, including a well-run technical education program.
Fabulous support staff and technicians that can get seemingly impossible things done quickly.
Great resources and lab spaces (if a bit dated).
The nature of the work encourages good work/life balance.
Fantastic benefits (though the pay is low).
Cons
No/limited opportunities for advancement makes this a hard place to work mid-career.
Good engineers are promoted to be mediocre managers.
Every program is under-funded, under-staffed, and over schedule.
Bad managers are shuffled around but rarely fired.