Culture Not For Everyone - Manager M/I Homes Employee Review

2.0
Mar 5, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Financially strong. Sales are brisk. Benefits above average.

Cons

A dysfunctional senior management environment, the leadership team lacks a clear vision, exhibits poor communication, and presents conflicting interests, leading to decision-making in silos and reduced organizational effectiveness. This scenario is further exacerbated by a culture of favoritism, where a select few, based on personal relationships rather than merit, are dishonestly promoted over more deserving individuals. Such favoritism undermines trust and team cohesion, as opportunities are allocated not by talent but allegiance. Additionally, executive management exacerbates the toxicity by routinely resorting to abusive behaviors, such as cursing at, yelling, and demoralizing the management team. This not only erodes the morale but also creates a culture of fear and suppresses any form of constructive dialogue or feedback, ultimately hindering the organization's growth and success.

Explore other reviews about M/I Homes

5.0
Feb 23, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I gained so much knowledge and skills.

Cons

Lots of traveling, wear and tear on the personal vehicle.

1.0
Mar 21, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Earning potential was great, benefits were decent.

Cons

An incredibly toxic work environment defined by micromanagement, constantly shifting and unrealistic sales goals, and a leadership team that often operated more like enforcers than mentors. Targets were routinely increased at the end of each quarter, effectively stripping salespeople of earned bonuses and eroding trust. The culture leaned heavily on intimidation and public pressure. Sales meetings often felt more like performance critiques than coaching, and required role-playing exercises were frequently uncomfortable and unnecessary. There was a consistent pattern of favoritism, where poor behavior was overlooked for some while others were held to entirely different standards. Management’s approach to motivation relied too heavily on guilt and financial pressure, with paid time off subtly discouraged and income used as leverage rather than support. Collaboration was undermined by leadership creating internal competition in ways that felt divisive rather than productive. There were also multiple instances of inappropriate and racially insensitive remarks made in group settings, which further contributed to an unprofessional and uncomfortable environment. Overall, while the role had potential, the culture and leadership practices made it difficult to succeed or feel respected.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All