Company only good for Counters when you leave - Anonymous employee Lombard Risk Employee Review

1.0
Jan 31, 2018
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Work life balance Excellent company if you know how to play management and like to delay everything by making everything look complex Excellent company if you like going to your manager for every little things. If yes you will be recognized and admired

Cons

Not a good comapny if you work hard Managers have no technical or people management skills Not a good company if you go quitely and professionally about your job as managers love people who come to them every few minutes and give them attention Management have some special people to whom they award ridiculous counters which is de-motivating other hard working employees No growth what so ever as they truly believe in people who continue doing same work day in and out without asking to do anything new You will learn nothing from management as they are bunch of people who live in there own world without knowing ground reality

Explore other reviews about Lombard Risk

4.0
Jan 23, 2018
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Some super smart people in key positions and new annual Town Hall Meeting where the CEO shares the direction and goals of Lombard Risk and express sincere appreciation for the staff's efforts. The continued efforts to formalize processes as we move from a small "mom and pop" company to a global company

Cons

LOTS of changes throughout the past several years makes for a very unsettling and disruptive atmosphere

2.0
Sep 30, 2018
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Lombard's core strength is their deep domain knowledge in collateral and regulatory reporting. They have a higher concentration industry experts with years of experience than much larger competitors. This deep expertise has led to award winning products which are well regarded within their niche. However, Lombard has struggled over the years to match their industry expertise with a similar level of qualty in their management and in the technical quality of software releases.

Cons

The firm has gone through a succession of management changes. They started with founders who had extensive industry relationships and rain making ability but who often lacked professionalism and basic management skills. They were followed by a group of professional managers who while they were more effective managers lacked the industry relationships and rain making skills of the founders they replaced. Ultimately, this led to a depleted pipeline of new clients. They also misinterpreted a temporary spurt in demand to meet regulatory requirements for a long-term growth trend. This contributed to an ill advised dramatic increase in the cost base which proved unsustainable and forced Lombard into selling out to Vermeg. While the leadership at Vermeg may be well intentioned, they have inherited a company which is losing millions of euros, has lost ground to competitors in some key industry trends, and has serious software quality issues with no realistic plan to consolidate development centers and reduce costs in china and uk without losing key knowledge of their own software. They likely have no choice but to rapidly cut costs which will limit their ability to invest in the product at a time when their competitors continue to race ahead to capitalize on new trends in the industry. The company may survive as part of Vermeg, but its best days seem to be behind them now.

4
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All