Lilt: Another Silicon Valley Cult - Anonymous employee Lilt Employee Review

1.0
Mar 4, 2020
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Though there are employees who are talented and friendly, underneath this Silicon Valley startup lies more politics and favoritism that meets the eye. If taking verbal abuse and witnessing others being humiliated regularly is both your professional and personal kink, then apply, because Lilt would be a good fit.

Cons

Shortly starting at Lilt, red flags began to surface. 1. Turnover. Rampant turnover on different teams with no visibility or communication of updates. Explanations of various departures were vague, cryptic or could not even be discussed. 2. Unprofessional environment: Snide, offensive and unprofessional aka 'humorous' comments about employees personal lives. Personal life style choices will be subject to public humiliation and scrutiny. 3. Double standards: WFH is frowned upon openly by the CEO. The CEO has shamed employees for WFH and vacation days. Making doctors appointments or calling in sick is nearly impossible. "Make weekend appts" was the message made clear at the start. This WFH policy became a double standard. Many from the exec team, including the CEO often took vacations, worked from home without any visibility. 4. Product doesn't work. Whenever the product broke down or the services advertised were not provided to the client, the services and engineering teams get thrown under the bus on a continual basis by members of the exec team and often shame them openly on mistakes, big or small. 5. Cult like praise. Shortly after starting, the CEO would schedule 1:1's to talk with everyone about what can be improved. While others might find this engaging, this put me at unease. This approach felt parallel to what cult-like figures in history have done onto the masses. Followers, beware. 6. Understaffed/Overworked teams. Engineering and services work over 70 hours a week. They are bombarded with issues left and right with minimal bandwidth to manage. Smart, talented, driven employees, but with little recognition and constantly stressed by demands made by the exec team to get things out faster and faster. Majority of the services team worked weekends! Whats more, the churn on these teams was staggering. I've witnessed several people cry over tech issues and sudden departures. Which leads me to point #7. 7. Poor management. Majority of employees at this company are not familiar with the translation industry. In addition, room for growth is not visible or an option for many. Upper management often places blame on eng/services/product when things go south. 8. Zero Work Life Balance. Often times the CEO would emphasize the importance of the company. That one could reach the CEO 24/7, via mobile, email, the list goes on. Others might take comfort hearing this. I found this alarming. If one doesn't work more than 60+ hours, you are perceived as not dedicated to the cause. Work long hours, keep your head down and never question. All these patterns set the tone for a company culture. Ask yourself, "is this what I want in a work place?"

avatar
Lilt Response
6y
Thanks for taking the time to write hard feedback. It's true that 2019 was a very hard year operationally, as we grew headcount by 3x and transitioned from founder management to a leadership team. However, the hard work paid off with our strong revenue growth and fundraise in the second half, both of which happened ahead of schedule. Re: your specific feedback: - Turnover - we revised our sales motion and operations in 2019, which meant that we had to say goodbye to teammates hired in 2018 who were no longer a good fit (for either them or us). Explanations of departures differ by case since our principle is that everyone gets to leave the company on their terms. - Unprofessional environment - I'm saddened to learn that you felt that personal lifestyle choices were judged publicly. This isn't consistent with my expectations for the team. I'll pass this feedback to our management team. - Double standards - In 2019 we did not have a WFH policy as we believed that the best way to improve operations was to work in close proximity. In 2020 we've opened two more offices, and our ability to communicate virtually has improved considerably, so we may revisit our policy. I don't agree that "many of the exec team, including the CEO often took vacations." It was a hard year, and I personally didn't take a vacation in 2019, and most of the leadership team took less than their allocation. We strive to be more balanced in 2020. - Product — Technology-enabled services is a hard business with many moving parts. Root-cause analysis is essential for improving. Findings of these analyses, which we conduct regularly, can be received as blame if they aren't presented correctly. I've had to work on this, and I've passed this feedback to our management team. - CEO 1:1s — I conduct the final-round interview for everyone who joins our team, and then follow-up with them on their onboarding experience a few weeks into the job. First impressions really matter. We do strive to constantly improve, and to my knowledge, these meetings have yielded great ideas for improving our recruiting and onboarding processes. - Understaffed teams — Our services team, which I led, was understaffed in 2019. Since our fundraise we've increased the team size, and hired a veteran leader from the industry. As someone who works long hours, I can't say that I witness anyone working 70+ weeks on a sustained basis. - Poor management — I agree that industry leadership expertise was a significant gap in 2019. Since the middle of last year we've hired an industry veteran to lead our services team, and hired a half dozen senior teammates with significant industry experience on our sales and account management teams. In 2020 we'll continue to make strategic hires from the industry. - Work-life balance — Again, as someone who does work long hours, I can't say that I've seen anyone regularly work 60-70 hours / week, and that certainly isn't my expectation. There are times—ahead of a product launch, a major customer delivery, or before the close of the quarter—when certain people do work longer hours, but that is to be expected in an early-stage startup. Unlike most startups, we do have a defined vacation allocation, and we encourage everyone to take it.

Explore other reviews about Lilt

5.0
Apr 28, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- team players, easy to find support when needed - one of the best internal tech stacks I’ve used - the $$

Cons

- no coffee until 8am - expensive parking near office - no SKO

1
avatar
Lilt Response
1mo
Love this. The internal tech stack getting a shoutout is especially fun to hear, our engineering and research teams put a lot into it. Noted on the coffee situation and the parking, both very real. As for SKO, it's something we've talked about internally and hope to bring back when the timing is right. Thanks for being part of the team.
4.0
May 4, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The people on my team are the best part of this job. They're sharp, deeply committed, and willing to run at hard problems without being asked twice. Leadership has earned my trust by being honest about what's working and what isn't, and by owning their decisions when things don't land the way they hoped. The CEO is not perfect, but is open to feedback and visibly tries to grow, which I respect more than polish. The company recently took a hard look at pay and made meaningful adjustments, which sent a real signal to my team that they're valued. There's also a clear push to take smart risks and keep building forward, especially around agentic AI, and that energy is contagious when you're leading people through change.

Cons

The recent right sizing was painful. The teams that remain are sharper and more focused, but I watched good people leave, and that weight stays with you as a manager. Work life balance is treated like a topic we don't talk about, and I see the cost of that in my own team. People do their best thinking when they're rested, and right now the unspoken expectation is to always be on. Benefits sit at average or slightly below where they should be for a company asking this much of its people, and that gap is something my team notices.

1
avatar
Lilt Response
1mo
What stands out in this review is that the same teams absorbing hard change are also the ones running closest to empty. You're right that rest hasn't been something we've made enough room to talk about, and the signal from the top hasn't matched what we'd want for our people. Your advice on rest and celebration goes together for us, because both come back to whether the work feels sustainable and worth it. Benefits are part of that same picture, and somewhere we know we have ground to cover. Thank you for leading through a hard stretch with this much care.
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All